There is no need to recreate the playgound, the odd title is only on the changset, although you may want to disconnect it from the road.
The name on this path is is probably not verifiable and the path obviously exists so is fine.
It would be good to map the legal lines, if a farmer illegally obstructs a public highway with crops then he needs reporting to the council so they can take action against him. You are legally entitled to walk through the crop, and certainly should not go around to avoid damage.

I drove passed here today, your edits are entirely fiction. I intend to revert them.

Hi, welcome to OSM.
What is the source of this addition? I am not aware of any such path. The name also looks a bit odd.
Cheers Phil

Hi, what is the source of these edits, this entire estate looks very unlikely to really exist.

Is tourism really the correct tag for way/460389218 ?
Aerial imagery suggest it is residental, rather than somewhere to go on holiday?

A miners welfare is normally tagged as amenity=social_club, it is unlikely to be a traditional pub.

Hi, whilst I can see that Dalefiemapld Drive has been extended on mapbox imagery, I don't see a turning circle. It looks like a cul-de-sac, you certainly cannot turn around without using reverse.

Fixed in changeset/44553986

Hi, something went a little wrong with this changset. Whilst you created a building in Japan, you also dragged a crossing node in London. I have fixed the node drag and hopefully did not affect the building.

Hi, welcome to OSM. I think that something has gone a bit wrong here. We normally change the tagging on a closed pub to disused:amenity=pub. For some reason you have changed the name of the bus stop.

Hi, I don't think the postbox is actually named Post Box. The name tag should not normally be filled in for object such a postboxes.

Hi, welcome to OSM. What is actually here, is it a building or simply a signpost.
I imagine that you have made a typo and it is spelt Centre rather than the American way?
Cheers Phil

Not really a comment on the mapping, or the rendering, but if a PROW has stiles or kissing gates then it is a public footpath. You should not be taking a bike on such paths.

Reverted after user did not respond to changeset comments

Reverted after maps.me user didn't respond

Also way/24271318 is a 3-4m wide road. It does not have lanes, its not wide enough. It also has no sidewalk, yet you have tagged it as having a sidewalk on both sides. This can lead to misleading routing information being provided to map users.
It is important that we map what is actually on the ground and not simply add tags. The presence of pointless tags such as foot=yes, cycleway=no just clutters the database and makes your damaging edits harder to spot.

Hi, welcome to OSN.
Please remember that OSM is a live database and should not be used for test data that does not exist in the real world.

Hi, I have reverted this change.
The admin_level=10 boundary already exists and you removed the place node which is important for navigation.

Please do not add spam to name tags or change the name of bus stops away from their official name. I am removing these tags.

Hi, is there really a church here. The area is mapped as a school and imagery suggests that the mapping was correct.