Bore da
Croisi Y OSM, place=village is a very strange way to tag houses and gardens. Please take care to capture what is actually visible on imagery.

Diolch Phil

Hi
Names in OSM are for things that have an actual name, in the case of roads have an actual sign.

Please do not add descriptions to the name tag.

See osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things

Cheers Phil

This route is a legally a bridleway.

Have added appropriate access tags, setting the middle track section to private for motor vehicles which will prevent motor vehicles from being routed that way whilst maintaining access for foot/bikes/horses and farm vehicles

Cheers Phil

Why have you removed the traffice islands here? One of your colleagues vandalised this area two days ago, and has yet to respond to my comments.

I am reverting this again as it was correct.

Cheers Phil

You also broke the transition point between the 40 mph and 50 mph zones which is clear if you select the best imagery.

Hi, this edit is very very wrong. Queensway is not a dual carriageway, there are just some small islands either side of the traffic lights.

Roads should only be mapped as separate ways where there is physical separation.

I am reverting this edit.

Legally a bridleway so motor_vehicle=private and added access tags for foot/horses and bikes

The track you have photos of is probably Turners Lane. This section is legally a public footpath and therefore should not be used by motor vehicles, that is not to mention the geography of the area. Turners Lane is diagonal for a reason.

Who are you working for?

Please read a conform to https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines before making further changes to the map.

Tagging in osm is about what is legal, not what is safe or possible for vans. This track is used by agricultural vehicles and is legal for horses and cyclists. Adding a tracktype will indicate to a router if it is suitable for a particular type of vehicle.

Then the motor_vehicle=no is redundant.

What is DA?

Cheers Phil

I have changed this to a track, it is certainly not a footpath and it is certainly usable by farm vehicles. The edit history suggests it may be used by Amazon vans.

Cheers Phil

Hi, a oneway street on which there is a node prohibiting motor vehicles seems a bit odd. Are you sure?

Cheers Phil

Leads to a farm, so service

Restored footpath, certainly not a track

However amenity=yes is totally meaningless, although that was fixed by a maproulette challenge and if the polygon was incorrect then most mappers would spend a few minutes fixing it rather than doing the bare minimum

Cheers Phil

Hi again, I am not sure what you are trying to achieve here. There is no reason why motor vehicles cannot be routed through a pedestrian area with the correct tags, however it is unusual for there to be no restrictions.

This certainly looks like a typical pedestrian street to me https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/31Dad9bVfm3PJGw9z-V1vQ

However your statement that it accessible to vehicles is only partly true, it is accessible to certain vehicles at certain times. It certainly should not be used for through routing. See https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/fWvsdJF_gvUihfXK1uuZ2g

Cheers Phil

Hi Ell
The first question has to be, do you know if they are they using openstreetmap data?

If they are, then whilst I would consider a router for motor vehicles passing a bollard to be an error, you could add motor_vehicle=no to the bollard and split the way and tag that as motor_vehicle=no.

Cheers Phil

Hi, this edit has gone a little wrong.

There was a bollard mapped, which prevents routing by motor vehicle but allowed routing for pedestrians an cyclists. By breaking the connection this is no longer usable by pedestrians or cyclists.

I have reverted this edits, or is there really no connectivity here?

Cheers Phil

Hi, this edit is not quite correct.

The public highway was as previously mapped, the kerbs and pavements can be seen on bing imagery.

The part you have added should be mapped as highway=service, service=driveway.

Cheers Phil