I have reverted this changeset as Mario did not respond

Bore da, Croeso y OSM.

The wikidata tag on this object was correct.

This is object is the admin boundary for the community, which had the correct tag.

This is not the city of St Davids which the wikidata you changed it to. That was already on the place node.

This changeset needs to be reverted.

Cheers Phil

If this path has a verifiable name (i.e. a sign) then the name should be on the way. You should not add a separate node and the description is not needed, we can see where it goes.
Cheers Phil

Please do not duplicate information, if the tags are on the building then you should not add a node. Also if a building has a housename then there is not need for a name tag containing the same information.

Cheers Phil

Just realised you did not add the opening hours.

Cheers Phil

Again please do not duplicate building and only use name tags for objects that have names, this is not called private dwelling.

Cheers Phil

I find it hard to believe the relatively new toilets have been replaced during lockdown. If they are connected to the building then you should correct that, not delete and redraw.
Please do not use name tags for objects that are descriptions, the name is not Public Toilets, the chances are there is no name however you have lost the important amenity tags which allows the object to be found.

Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM thank you for your edits however this edit has gone a little wrong.

You have moved Starbucks a long way from its actual location. Also Public holiday tagging of opening times does not really work in cases such as this, is it really open on Christmas Day?

Also Bear Steps Art Gallery was mapped as a node within the building, there is only one building so it is not good practice to create a duplicate building with duplicate tags.

Cheers Phil

There should be no problem tagging these as private. In ordering something for delivery you are giving permission for access.

Any router worth its salt will popup a dialog and ask, For example OSMand says "Your destination is located in an area with private access. Allow using private roads for this trip?"

Cheers Phil

I don't think way/833630805 extends to the middle of the road.

Cheers Phil

Fixed in changeset/89045457

Fixed in changeset/89045457

Please see my comments made in changeset/89031345

Cheers Phil

The parts that are still there is a difficult one, I did use waterway-derelict_canal for way/260667327 and way/260667329 where there is still water, but since then both the wiki and rendering have been changed.

Cheers Phil

I don't think the barrier is here.

Bing imagery shows the connection to The Parade much narrower, and there are no give way markings.

OS Opendata Roads shows that there is no road connection beyond the houses facing the parade. There is a service which runs along the front of the houses connected to King Edmund Street.

Narrow connection to The Parade is probably a cycleway.

Cheers Phil

Hi
Much of the railway you have added as railway=abandoned is through cropped fields and isn't actually recognisable as a former railway.
using railway=razed would be a far more accurate tag to use.
What source did you use?

Cheers Phil

That is way way/332753916

Hi, this edit has gone a little wrong, the ways you have tagged as The Shropshire Union Canal are not canals, they are more drainage ditches.
Cheers Phil

Thank you

ps I would tend to have gone with motor_vehicle=no bus=yes which allows foot/cyclists and doesn't exclude horses

Cheers Phil