OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
86195456 over 5 years ago

Vandalism reverted

86195449 over 5 years ago

Vandalism reverted

86188894 over 5 years ago

Vandalism reverted

86195456 over 5 years ago

Please stop vandalising OSM and take the rime to answer the questions already put to you.
The speed limit is clearly not 0. Why have you set it to such a ridiculous value?
This road is not Roundstone Bypass_1, why have you changed it.

86195449 over 5 years ago

Please stop vandalising OSM and take the rime to answer the questions already put to you.
The speed limit was set to 50 mph which is correct, it is not 80kph. Why have you changed it?
This road is not Littlehampton Road_1, why have you changed it.

86188894 over 5 years ago

Please stop vandalising OSM and take the rime to answer the questions already put to you,
This road is The Ridge_1, why have you changed it.
What does ATSR even mean?

86188563 over 5 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM and thank you for your edit.

From your description there is a bollard here?

Bollards only prevent the passage of motor vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists can still pass. By breaking the connectivity this prevents routers from routing pedestrians and cyclists this way.

The correct way to map situations like this is to add barrier=bollard with access tags, motor_vehicle=no, foot=yes, bicycle=yes.

Hope this is helpful, if you have any questions please don't be afraid to ask.

Cheers Phil

85560920 over 5 years ago

1 is a very odd maxspeed, especially as it defaults to kph.

Please can you explain what ATSR Edit map is and why you are making such odd edits?

Cheers Phil

86138537 over 5 years ago

Hi Rob
Thank you for your edits, however they do seem a little odd. Firstly Honeyhill Grove is already mapped a little way to the west. It would seem unlikely that there would be two roads with the same name so close together. Also this seems an unlikely place for a new development.
Houses, lampposts, trees, shrubs and benches should be placed in their actual positions and not connected to the road.
If you need help or advice then please ask, we are always happy to help a newbie.

Cheers Phil

85940583 over 5 years ago

Hi Jake
In the iD editor the 4th button down gives you a selection of imagery layers which can be used. Maxar looks good here, but you do need to look through them to see which works best.
The map is always going to be a representation of reallity, the path from Haughton Road looks like it goes straight into the pavement at the end of Almond Avenue. The pavement (sidewalk in OSM) is effectively a property of Almond Avenue. If you were to map it separately you then get into the problem of connectivity for routers. For example you want a router to send a pedestrian along the path, not around the road.
Have a go at improving things, the best mapping is always going to be from someone on the ground. You are welcome to ask if you have any questions.

Cheers Phil

85940583 over 5 years ago

Updated in changeset/85951687

85940583 over 5 years ago

I can see what has happened. The estate was drawn roughly before imagery was available and is a bit out of alignment. That road was added later in the correct place, but is Almond Avenue which is obviously a duplication.

I will align it all properly.

Thanks Phil

85940583 over 5 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM. I think this edit has gone a little wrong.

What evidence do you have that suggests that it does not exist as whilst the area is shown as farmland on bing imagery, this is old. More recent imagery shows it clearly?

Cheers Phil

85565442 over 5 years ago

Thank you for clarifying but please be careful how you describe things in your comments.

Cheers Phil

85620816 over 5 years ago

Hi, just wondering why you removed this driveway? It is very visible on imagery.

Cheers Phil

85565442 over 5 years ago

Hi again. You have not clarified what you mean by Street View. How do I see the grill?

Cheers Phil

85566144 over 5 years ago

Thank you Joe

Cheers Phil

85500384 over 5 years ago

Hi, I think this edit has gone a little wrong.

It seems a bit unlikely that the driveway and footpath are separate ways. Imagery confirms this. When adding the driveway the footpath should be split and share the way with the driveway. The driveway obviously needs foot=yes tags to ensure that walkers are able to use it.
Crossings are only mapped where there is at least a lowered kerb, this is not something found on a driveway.

Cheers Phil

85566144 over 5 years ago

Hi Joe
Thank you for your edit. Based on your comment I was able to find some new roads in OS Opendata, I have added them and estimated the residentail area.
Please could you check it?

Cheers Phil

85565442 over 5 years ago

Street View? Please clarify.