OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
83998202 over 5 years ago

Hi and thank you for your edits, a splash of green paint is sometimes a good thing.

However please remember that Abertawe is in a primarily English speaking city and the community have taken care with the ordering of Welsh and English names in Wales. Removing name:en completely is not acceptable.

Please remember that OSM is a live international database which is used by many people and companies, including deliveries which are much more critical at the present time.

Also please use meaningful changeset comments that describe what you are actually doing, it can be in Welsh if you want, but update tells the community nothing.

Cheers Phil

84139995 over 5 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM.

Thank you for you edits, however please do not use descriptions in the name tag. If a firestation or post office does not have a name, then you should leave the tag blank.

Cheers Phil

84059175 over 5 years ago

Hi, when adding details to an object they should refer to that object rather than the brand.

For example you have added facebook and twitter details for ASDA when the local object has both and these should be used.

Also whilst adding these details wouldn't a phone number be more useful?

Cheers Phil

83948794 over 5 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM.

There is a grass runway visible on imagery so it does exist. Maybe missing some tags but it should not be deleted.

Cheers Phil

83894318 over 5 years ago

The middle of a footpath is a bit of an odd place for a pedestrian crossing.
I have reverted this changeset

83890401 over 5 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM.
In OSM we only add thing that are verifiable and what you have added are meaning less doodles.
I have reverted this changeset.

83535542 over 5 years ago

No response and based on later edits I have reverted this.

83757341 over 5 years ago

Hi, please do not delete schools and redraw as houses. I have reverted this changeset.

83757579 over 5 years ago

Hi, in openstreetmap we map what exists on the ground. This appears to be fiction, we do not add things that will be removed later.
Vandalism reverted

83828992 over 5 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM. In OSM we add what exists in real life, please do not add test data.

The description 'to be planted' suggests that this is not yet a wood so plrobably shouldn't be mapped as one. The name NRN looks odd, the name field is for actual names and abbreviations are rarely names of woods.

Please only add what really, exists and please remember that OSM is a live database.

Cheers Phil

83782916 over 5 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM.
It always concerns me when a new mapper starts by deleting and 'improving' other experienced mappers work based purely on aerial imagery. I am assuming you are not local based on your US locale.
Please keep your changes small and try to add new stuff that is local to you.
You have changed the service ways in the car park into paths, which is odd as motor vehicles now cannot use them.
I am reverting this edit as it appear to have broken a well mapped feature.

Cheers Phil

83542786 over 5 years ago

No response so have reverted and redid the good bits.

Changeset was too big to pick through.

83751275 over 5 years ago

Hi, thank you for your edit however it has gone a little wrong and I have reverted it.

Shrewsbury School was already correctly mapped, it is not one big building.

Please continue to map but only add things that exist in real life.

Cheers Phil

83542786 over 5 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM. This is very big for a first edit. Please try to keep them smaller.

I am not sure what you mean by fix me requests, but if you means suggestions made by the iD editor, then they do need to be reviewed individually as the suggestions are often not the correct thing to do.

A few issues I have found.
The tags for English Bridge were already part of the relation, they should not be duplicated on the outer way.

M & S, H & M and Smiths are not individual buildings, the buildings forming Pride Hill were mapped correctly after much survey work.

Greenhous was mapped as an area, that was correct. It is not all a single building.

Drive-through=no is not needed on banks, do they even exist outside the US?

way/350314934 is part of Rea Brook, but the name should not be put onto the riverbank, the tagging was correct.

way/52280910 was still a construction site 3 weeks ago and as all building work has stopped then it probably still is.

Hazeldine Court is on the ground, it should not have level=1 on it.

What is the source of the screens at Cineworld?

Please take care mapping and check each tag that is being changed,

Please add new stuff, but keep you changes small.

Cheers Phil

83535542 over 5 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your edit however I am always a bit concerned when a new mapper begins by deleting a large number of existing objects.

Please continue to map, but try to add new objects and please look at and consider the warnings generated by the editor, such as crossing buildings.

Cheers Phil

83486181 over 5 years ago

HI, Black Lodge Brewing was already mapped. I have removed your duplication.

Cheers Phil

83477602 over 5 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM and thank you for your edit. Just one small thing, the name tag in OSM is used for actual names, Former Royal Mail Sorting Office is a description of what it used to be. Until it becomes something else, the name tag in this case should be removed.
Otherwise a good edit.
A question on existing data, Elizabeth House is more likely 46m tall and not 46 feet?

Cheers Phil

83445797 over 5 years ago

And make them meaningful. Data Change is not helpful.

83280779 over 5 years ago

Hi, what source did you actually use for this edit?
way/789750526 seems rather unlikely as it creates a routable link. I am guessing there is a break at some point but no imagery shows that and really this needs a survey. Don't know when that will be.
As a minimal hack please tag this as as a driveway with access=private which is how such shared driveways are normally tagged.

Cheers Phil

83368275 over 5 years ago

Hi, what evidence do you have to change this to a track? Imagery and usage doesn't suggest that to me.

Cheers Phil