OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
56600277 almost 8 years ago

Hi, this appears to be an undiscussed mechanical edit. Did you follow the procedure detailed in osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct and if so where was it discussed?

In my experience the two are different and this type of tag homogenising just makes for a bland map.

56320592 almost 8 years ago

Hi, this name does not fit the OSM naming convention. The name should be one or the other. Use either alt_name or loc_name tags for other names.
Cheers Phil

56292195 almost 8 years ago

Hi, this does not fit the wiki description of a living street. It is, as previously tagged a residential street (what it looks like) that has bollards. It is legally a cycleway.
Cheers Phil

56280899 almost 8 years ago

Hi, something has gone a little wrong here, I doubt that the name of the bus stop has been changed and unless something has been demolished please simply change the tag to disused:amenity=fuel. A close garage is still a landmark.
Cheers Phil

55844935 almost 8 years ago

Hi, what is the source of these edits?

Also the name suggests a record shop, however you continue to mistag and in this case have used electronics.

Cheers Phil

55718640 almost 8 years ago

Hi, thank you for your reply. The building has tags saying it is both a church and a medical centre, this is obviously confusing. Maps.me is a bit Mickey Mouse and doesn't handle this type of change at all well.
Would you be able to used the editor from osm.org and fix it?
You will need to change amenity=place_of worship and change it to amenity=doctors and remove the name Trinity Church.
If you need any help please ask.
Cheers Phil

55832973 almost 8 years ago

Doodle reverted

55718640 almost 8 years ago

Hi, Orrell Park Medical Centre is a very odd name for a church. Are you sure it is correct?

55809018 almost 8 years ago

Hi, this is a very odd name for a pub, are you sure its not an off-license which would be tagged as shop=alcohol?

Cheers Phil

55691690 almost 8 years ago

Hi, the tagging you are using is a bit confusing. On way way/555254812#map=16/52.4658/-2.2879 you have used access=private and foot=yes, these values contradict each other. If you can walk but not drive then maybe it should be motor_vehicle=private?

Cheers Phil

55630055 almost 8 years ago

Hi, the shoulder of mutton is already mapped. This is a duplicate.

Cheers Phil

55543612 almost 8 years ago

Hi, the name of a filling station is not going to be Shell, that is the brand they sell and is already correctly tagged. I am reverting this change.

55559688 almost 8 years ago

Hi, the tag tourism=apartment is intended to indicate a place that can be rented for a holiday. It is misleading to use it in this way. You could maybe map the building as building=apartments?

Cheers Phil

55546457 almost 8 years ago

Hi, I am wondering how you decided that Circle Cars is a Logistics company. That involves trucks. It is a taxi office, the name is a big clue.

Your armchair edit has now changed the meaning. Please do not remotely fix tags without considering what the mapper who added the tag meant.

55351012 almost 8 years ago

Hi, a building can never be a park. We tag thing as they are You need to consider the question "Is it somewhere I would want to sit and read a book or eat my lunch"?

55245074 almost 8 years ago

Hi, please could you add changeset comments so that local mappers can understand what you were trying to achieve.

Cheers Phil

55095821 almost 8 years ago

Hi, thank you for your additions but please could you put the references into the prow_ref tag rather than ref.

Cheers Phil

55098192 almost 8 years ago

Hi, both La Perla and the Jumeriah Hotel are already mapped. I have reverted this change.

54876484 almost 8 years ago

Actually I just spotted this note
note/5517

I have reverted this change as imagery is clearly out of date.
Cheers Phil

54876484 almost 8 years ago

Hi
I am really not sure about this edit.
Are you sure that the imagery is up to date?
This is a long way from your other edits so have you visited the location to check?
The area was altered by another mapper a few months ago making me think that it was correct.
Cheers Phil