trigpoint's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 89633098 | over 1 year ago | Hi
Please ensure you are aware of which country you are editing in. Cheers Phil |
| 89580411 | over 1 year ago | I have corrected the maxspeed tag to 60 mph and changed maxspeed:goods to maxspeed:hgv. Cheers Phil |
| 154807882 | over 1 year ago | Unfortunately that wasn't a typo. Cheers Phil |
| 154624811 | over 1 year ago | Hi, rather than remove the tracktype tag here wouldn't it be better to correct it? https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/941370 suggests tracktype=grade4 would be more informative for routers. Tracks do however need specific access tagging, this is actually a byway so it is lagal to access on foot/horse/bicycle or in a car. An off-roader would certainly be interested in routing along here. Tagging as a grade4 tracktype provides information to routers not to route a road car here but a Landrover definitely. Cheers Phil |
| 154490516 | over 1 year ago | Hi, what is the source of this edit? There is no soccer pitch on any available imagery. Cheers Phil |
| 154490286 | over 1 year ago | Hi
Cheers Phil |
| 154516846 | over 1 year ago | Thank you |
| 140561865 | over 1 year ago | Hi
Rather than private=yes you should use access=private. Cheers Phil |
| 154517495 | over 1 year ago | Hi
Please discuss these problems with the UK community rather than just changing things to see what happens. Cheers
|
| 154516846 | over 1 year ago | Hi, welcome to OSM.
Cheers Phil |
| 154068188 | over 1 year ago | Changed to highway_authority_ref |
| 154077615 | over 1 year ago | Changed to highway_authority_ref |
| 154077638 | over 1 year ago | Changed to highway_authority_ref and name fixed |
| 154077653 | over 1 year ago | Changed to highway_authority_ref |
| 154077680 | over 1 year ago | Fixed by Nathan_A_RF |
| 154077697 | over 1 year ago | Reverted |
| 154077800 | over 1 year ago | Reverted |
| 154077697 | over 1 year ago | In OSM we follow the on the ground rule, this road is signed as the A167(M) so that is what should be what we map. Sabre is again not a valid source for OSM. Cheers Phil |
| 154077800 | over 1 year ago | Hi again
Again sabre is not a valid source for use in OSM. I have reverted this edit. Cheers Phil |
| 154068188 | over 1 year ago | Hi, welcome to OSM. We do not tag refs for tertiary and unclassified roads as these are only used internally by local authorities and they are not signed. Telling a normal user of OSM to follow the C2073 is only going to confuse as there are no signs. Sabre's wiki is also not a valid source for OSM, we do not know what source they have use to obtain this information. Where we do map such references we use the tag highway_authority_ref highway%20authority%20ref=*?uselang=en Cheers Phil |