Hi, mae hyn yn ddefnydd rhyfedd iawn o'r briffordd = preswyl. Fel arfer, ffyrdd sy'n arwain at ffermydd yn cael eu mapio fel naill ai annosbarthedig neu wasanaeth yn dibynnu ar amodau'r mynediad.
Hefyd dylai'r sylwadau changeset fod mewn iaith glir fel y gall mappers eraill yn deall, yna yn hytrach na twitteresque gobbledy gook.

Hi, this is a very odd use of highway=residential. Roads leading to farms are normally mapped as either unclassified or service depending on access conditions.
Also changeset comments should be in plain language so other mappers can understand then rather than twitteresque gobbledy gook.

Hi, I know the tagging here was inconsistent. But this section was probably right.
Kingsland Bridge and the associated roads are privately owned and not PROW hence access=permissive was correct.

Hi, should footway way/485430915 not connect to Bynner Street, rather than the Prince of Wales car park, it should also connect to the service road (probably needs parking_aisle too). I did spot some sort of path there yesterday after a couple of Threads to get a chinese. Will have to explore, but do you know its legal status? It looks a useful cut through.
Also what is Prospet House, it looks large and should probably have some sort of operator tag.

No response so reverting

Hi, welcome to OSM. Does this guest house have a name. It is very unusual for a business not to, also does it have a phone number/website?

Hi, welcome to OSM.
What is the actual source of these edits? The document you quote does not have specific permission for use.

Does this shop still exist?
The domain is for sale.

Hi Robert
I have already removed a similar node by this user from this location. The name 'Home' gives it away as a personal marker by a maps.me user.
This one should also be removed.
Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM. The correct way to tag a field where sheep graze is landuse=farmland, although farmland is normally left blank.
For some reason you have made a mistake and tagged it as water, wont the sheep drown?

Can you walk between the two, or is there some sort of barrier?

As it is designated as a public_bridleway foot is very defiintely allowed, as are horses and bikes. The bicycle=yes tag is therefore pointless and adds tag clutter.

Hi, what is the source of this edit?
You have removed footpath L57 and the airport trail for example. L57 is a PROW and cannot simply be closed, it will at most have been diverted. Do you have any reference to this?

Hi, also spotted that you have used=ele=1, that means 1m above sealevel. The correct tag is layer=1, as already used on Eastgate Street North.

Hi, welcome to OSM
Thank you for your addition but please remember that changeset comments are intended to inform other mappers of your intent and should be in plain language.
Meaningless hashtag comments fail to do that, please do not use them in OSM.

Thank you.
It looked like spam, both the username and long description.

Hi, is this a real business that customers can visit?
I was about to ask, the website looks like it is contact by web or phone only so should not be in OSM.
Cheers Phil

The village was already mapped as Llanddew, which was correct according to OS OpenData, my view is that this maps.me edit is probably a personal marker should be reverted, it altered an existing object.

Hi, postboxes do not normally have names, they have a reference number which is already mapped. The name you have added is just a description so I removed the name.

Hello, is there any reason you have changed these halts to stations?
When I last caught a train to Llandecwyn I had to ask the guard to stop, which makes it a halt.

S’il vous plaît pourriez-vous expliquer la raison de ce changement ? Vous avez enlevé l’étiquette d’agrément, supprimé le nom : es et changé le nom de tag du Centre vers les Centres.

Please could you explain the reason for this change? You have removed the amenity tag, removed name:es and changed the name tag from Centre to Centres.