OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
139525706 over 2 years ago

Trunk roads restored

139525706 over 2 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM.
Thank you for your edits however this changeset has gone very wrong. These roads are not primary.

The A458 through Welshpool is trunk (green signs). Salop Road is now just tertiary (it has no ref signs anymore) since the A458 trunk route moved to Mill Street. I surveyed it myself a few weeks ago.

Cheers Phil

139313349 over 2 years ago

Apart from there is no concept of traffic circles in the UK. Junction=circular is used on roundabouts with traffic lights although routers treat them exactly the same as roundabouts.
Cheers Phil

139313349 over 2 years ago

It cannot be defined as a traffic circle. It is just a one way road.

Cheers Phil

138953178 over 2 years ago

Thank you

138953178 over 2 years ago

Hi after discussion with others in the UK community and noting the changeset comment on version #18 stating it is the mainline of the A14 we believe that this edit should be reverted back to trunk.

Cheers Phil

139394610 over 2 years ago

Fixed after community discussion

139394610 over 2 years ago

Again this edit is incorrect. There is no junction=circular here. It is just a dual carriageway with double cross-cuts.

The direction is also incorrect. way/140650910 should be trunk_link.

Cheers Phil

139313661 over 2 years ago

Again not a roundabout, should be junction=circular as it has traffic lights.

Cheers Phil

139311725 over 2 years ago

Hi again
This is also not a roundabout, its not a junction=circular either. Imagery shows give way markings so just a oneway road.
On streetside imagery you can see there is a parking lane on the right, which confirms it is not a roundabout.

Cheers Phil

139313349 over 2 years ago

Hi
This edit is incorrect. This is a circular one way road, not a roundabout.

The roads joining have standard give way markings, not roundabout entry markings.

It was correctly mapped before and needs to be reverted.

Cheers Phil

139256521 over 2 years ago

Sorry Alex, I meant to comment on the version after yours.

Cheers Phil

139256521 over 2 years ago

Bore da
This edit has gone very wrong.

It was correct before you changed it, now it points to the wrong page

Diolch Phil

139178518 over 2 years ago

Hi, this edit does not make a lot of sense.

It now says name=Asda brand=Spar, which is it?

Cheers Phil

139111852 over 2 years ago

Thank you.
My suspicion is that this never was a bridge. Carreghofa Lane originally crossed bridge 93, which now carries the cycleway slightly to the west.

This needs a survey, which I will do if it stops raining for long enough, but my suspicion is that the bridge and note tags should be removed.

Dropped bridge is a copy of an error in wikipedia. It is not a bridge but filled in with a culvert running through it.

I have removed the bridge tags.

Cheers Phil

139111852 over 2 years ago

Bore da
This edit has gone a little wrong and has lost important information.

Have you visited and seen something that has recently changed?

In merging 'identical' ways together you have also merged the way that connected them which is not identical, way/925258534/history. This short section is in a culvet so no boats can pass, unless of course its a coracle which you can carry.

This edit needs to be reverted however I am intrigued as to why you made it.

Diolch Phil

102189880 over 2 years ago

Comments directed at Krako73.
The description is very clear and gives accurate information.

Culterted does imply there is no connection, beyond water flow through the culterts.

Unfortunately the reopening of the canal was not taken into account when the A483 was built.

134788105 over 2 years ago

Hi
When you surveyed this pub you missed the most important payment tag which is where it differs from most pubs, payment:cash=no.

Cheers Phil

138309352 over 2 years ago

Ah, hadn't thought of phones. There is no edit on the phone although the details button is there.
Also no obvious way to get control of mapillary. With most images are forward facing so you need to be a few back not right on top of it.

138309352 over 2 years ago

Ok, I see what is going on now.

I had only spotted the edit button, which takes you into the OSM editor and allows you to save each edit.

However there is an I button on the page, which shows the existing tags, some of which may be outdated. For example the name, as in this case.

Brand is a relatively recent tag to be used, traditionally the brand has been in the name tag. This really should be reviewed for each edit. Chances are there is an a name visible which can be updated.

Simply looking at brand is not the best thought out task.

Cheers Phil