1. removed bicycle=no from service road, I can not think where this would ever make sense

    Closed
    #125204864 0 1 0 0
  2. removed bicycle=no from service road, I can not think where this would ever make sense

    Closed
    #125204839 0 1 0 0
  3. I can see no reason to exclude bikes here, it is not a sidewalk, the street imagery looks OK, removed bicycle=no and changed from a footway to a path

    Closed
    #125204655 0 1 0 0
  4. North of Reema Bvd its fine_gravel, south its concrete, the surface tags are not intuitive, see Mapillary images

    Closed
    #125201484 2 3 0 0
  5. Its not a sidewalk. Street level images available soon show no signs prohibiting bikes, removed bicycle=no

    Closed
    #125171703 0 1 0 0
  6. Its not a sidewalk. Street level images available soon show no signs prohibiting bikes, removed bicycle=no

    Closed
    #125171649 0 1 0 0
  7. Split ways at top of hill. the southern half is clearly a combined track, Mapillary images available soon, at the north end it could terminate of follow either branch

    Closed
    #125171439 1 1 0 0
  8. signed as combined path, Mapillary photos available soon remove bicycle=no

    Closed
    #125171278 0 1 0 0
  9. Car park is closed, neighbours complained of drug dealing

    Closed
    #125171164 0 1 0 0
  10. On private land so its a guess, not happy with my previous reversion, restoring the access=private and deleting the bicycle=no

    Closed
    #125170427 0 1 0 0
  11. move tardis to saved GPS coordinates

    Closed
    #125166890 0 1 0 0
  12. Removed bicycle=no. This is not a sidewalk. There is good street level imagery. There is no signage prohibiting bicycles.

    Closed
    #125166768 0 1 0 0
  13. removed outdated cycleway=track, remove bicycle=no this is not a sidewalk, there is no signage banning bicycles

    Closed
    #125166676 0 1 0 0
  14. Its not a sidewalk. Street level images show no signs prohibiting bikes, removed bicycle=no

    Closed
    #125165177 0 1 0 0
  15. Removed bicycle=no. This is not a sidewalk. There is good street level imagery. I ride this a lot. There is no signage prohibiting bicycles.

    Closed
    #125142563 0 1 0 0
  16. Philam questioned the previous edit in a fixme. I have gone a step further and removed bicycle=no. It is not a sidewalk (US english to avoid ambiguity). There is good Mapillary street level imagery. There is no signage excluding bikes.

    Closed
    #125141958 0 1 0 0
  17. Removed bicycle=no, there is no indication that bicycles are not allowed, it is not a sidewalk (using the US terminology to avoid ambiguity), I have uploaded 5 Mapillary points https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/tonyf1?lat=-37.99773407157667&lng=145.2436

    Closed
    #125141128 0 1 0 0
  18. https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/tonyf1?lat=-37.9919545&lng=145.2528097&z=17&pKey=1112663542967210&focus=photo signposted as shared path

    Closed
    #125136773 0 1 0 0
  19. Clearly marked as shared path, at least as far as Kirkham Rd see https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/tonyf1?lat=-38.00102989999999&lng=145.2081852&z=16.33196096175662&pKey=207373444956525&focus=photo

    Closed
    #125128994 0 1 0 0
  20. North half is cycle only, south part shared path, clearly signposted see https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/tonyf1?lat=-38.003850944266304&lng=145.20741005769707&z=16.33196096175662&pKey=1427843874356878&focus=map

    Closed
    #125128909 1 1 0 0