It was some time ago - I remember looking them up in something at least vaguely official. But it could have been CBRD; I should have noted the source when I submitted the change!

Thanks. I've fixed this, and in progress of more accurately tracing both aqueducts using OS 6"/mile mapping from early 1900s.

The western end looks slightly off compared to the 1960s map - it splits into sidings, mostly under the present-day Kirkland Drive and on to the old Carrongrove Paper Mill. That part is probably more accurate to tag railway=dismantled, I think. Will update to correct it.

Please resurrect way/246892527 - deleting that broke relation/3332503. Thanks.

Please use tag "operator" to indicate the company occupying a building. And correct "Saintsbury's"! Thanks.

Hi, and welcome to Openstreetmap! Please take care with your tags; I've made repairs to one of the nodes in this changeset, but you'll need to tidy the others yourself. The one I fixed is the DEBRA shop, which had "Yes" instead of "yes" for wheelchair, and an incomplete/misformatted phone number, and some other problems - see the history at node/4884152266/history

I've retagged as highway=service, as this isn't a public road. Use highway=tertiary only for roads on Highland Council's List of Adopted Roads (C class).

I didn't measure any of the roads, but a good number of them are less than the 2.75m you'd expect for a new-build. If you have the information, then feel free to add 'width' tags. Some of the roads tagged in this change are wider, like narrow two-way roads as mentioned in your link; they would also benefit from additional "width" tag.

I've just reviewed it all, and I only had a couple to fix. I also updated the E16 route relation through this section to use the new motorway.

Yes - good catch. Now fixed.

That Google link was just a redirection to http://www.dundryview.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/SBL-newsletter.pdf, where the outline of the lime kilns looks very different to that on OSM - perhaps it needs a re-survey? If you're in the area, you may be able to get access to the new roundabout too. I only get to this region about once every five years or so, so don't wait for me to do it!

I moved the roundabout because that's where my GPS trace of the southbound side located it. Yes, that oneway tag should have been proposed:oneway - I'll fix that if no-one else got to it first.

Fixed (both - I saw no evidence of one-way working)

Yes, I have the photos, but I don't generally publish my survey photos or GPS tracks. Is there something in particular that you want a picture of?

No, it's not - I disconnected that a while ago when I surveyed the new access from B981 under the railway viaduct.

Thanks for spotting this. I think that the cycleway is routed over the new track to Low Street - I've made a best-guess edit in changeset/42182872; it could do with an on-the-ground check to be completely sure. None of my photos have any NCN signage in them at all.

Thanks for the update; I've changed my tag templates over to the new format.

No, there's not supposed to be a gap - looks like the section under the bridge (with reduced lane count and possibly height limit) got deleted. I'll fix it as soon as I get back to my editing workstation (tonight, I hope).

This one is not handmade - it looks like a proper highways sign - aluminium, reflective coat, etc. It really is an official advisory one-way. Like I say, I've never seen anything similar elsewhere.

Hi Gerd, Crossgreen drive is signposted as a recommended one-way (I can't remember the exact wording on the sign, but could look it it up if necessary; it's certainly something I've never seen elsewhere). I take that to mean that there's no legal order preventing other-way traffic, but that if everyone follows the advice, then traffic will flow more freely (the road isn't generally wide enough for two-way traffic).