tkk's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 148509825 | almost 2 years ago | revertovano |
| 148511788 | almost 2 years ago | revertovano |
| 134845693 | over 2 years ago | Ahoj, tohle neni rozcestnik ale information=route_marker. Stejne tak ve Fody jsou tyhle fotky 'silnicni' a 'znaceni'. Viz. https://openstreetmap.cz/git/tom.k/Fody/wiki/PhotosExamples Bye tom.k |
| 134206839 | over 2 years ago | Prosim o upravu zpatky na rozcestniky, tohle nejsou znacky, viz napr. https://openstreetmap.cz/git/tom.k/Fody/wiki/PhotosExamples |
| 127111834 | about 3 years ago | No, we in CZ are using tag, that is not documented, it is your interpretation, that is is not correct. The main point is, that you are not using it so it does not hurt you to have it there and still you remove it so you make the data worse for us. |
| 127111834 | about 3 years ago | OK, sorry for my misunderstanding. If content of OSM data in Germany is driven solely by your personal view and needs, then it is of course correct to delete whatever you want without taking other's needs into account. |
| 127111834 | about 3 years ago | But it was not replaced with any such tag, just removed without a reason nor replacement. You may not use it, but as others do, removing it makes the data worse not better. |
| 127111834 | about 3 years ago | Hello, why are you removing tag about no ref present? It is used to distinguish between unknown ref status and known no ref. Please keep it if possible. Thank you. |
| 119291359 | over 3 years ago | Presne tak, to je nejhorsi varianta, proto se to taky snazim sjednocovat. Tohle ale menit zpatky nebudu. Mej se. |
| 119291359 | over 3 years ago | Ahoj, je smutné, jak jeden uživatel (Sten) způsobí, že reálná kvalita dat se výrazně zhorší, ohání se dodržováním pravidel (určených pro něco úplně jiného) a většina mu ještě nadšeně tleská. Viz https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-cz/2018-June/019261.html |
| 121780132 | over 3 years ago | Ahoj, rozcestnik Sázava klášter má podle fotky ve fody z 2019 i silniční rozcestník. Máš aktuální fotku, že jsi bicycle=yes smazal? (https://osm.fit.vutbr.cz/fody/?id=28870, node/477219657 ). Diky |
| 120634301 | over 3 years ago | |
| 120634301 | over 3 years ago | Zdravim, opravdu byl na miste rozcestnik odstranen? Pokud ano, byla zrusena i zelena turisticka znacka? Diky |
| 117686222 | almost 4 years ago | Why do you think this was mechanical edit? |
| 117686222 | almost 4 years ago | Yes, ti will. For CZ (where I intended to make the change) it is (among other ways) done with photos collected in Fody project (for example: https://openstreetmap.cz/#map=15/50.7694/14.7777&layers=dGB). When I found, that it was applied to whole world, I was first thinking about a revert, but in this case, where board_type=yes makes no sense, I concluded it will be better to leave it as is and not create another large changeset. |
| 117686222 | almost 4 years ago | Yes, the size was a mistake, but I realize it only after submited. The intention was to limit this to CZ only with few related nodes. |
| 116642096 | almost 4 years ago | OK, jak pojedu kolem, tak tam zkusim juknout, zatim nechavam zruseny. Bye tom.k |
| 116642096 | almost 4 years ago | Zdravim, v ramci teto sady zmen byl mimo jine odstranen cyklo rozcestnik v Hynkove. Proc byl zrusen, resp. z jakeho zdroje je informace o jehu zruseni? Dekuji tom.k |
| 110567581 | about 4 years ago | Neco jsem uz prosel, ale urcite jsem nenasel vsechno. Hezky den. |
| 110567581 | about 4 years ago | Ano, nic lepsiho asi nemame. Tabule davame do relace dane NS, takze to lze urcite vyuzit. board:title ma byt novejsi nahrada za name ale AFAIK se nepouziva. Staci takto? |