OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
77404275 almost 6 years ago

*road class

77404275 almost 6 years ago

Hi,

Reverting your edits, classificatio to residential.

thanks,
kalyan.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77404275

77406024 almost 6 years ago

Hi,

Reverting your edits, modified road class to residenntial road.

thanks,
Kalyan.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77406024

77603482 almost 6 years ago

Hi,

Road class is residential here, reverting your editd.

Thanks,
Kalyan.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77603482

77642423 almost 6 years ago

Hi,

Reverting your edits, these are residential roads.

Thanks,
Kalyan.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77642423

77770991 almost 6 years ago

Hi,

Reverted your edits, these are residential roads.

thanks,
Kalyan.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77770991

77771633 almost 6 years ago

Hi,

Reverted your edits, these residential roads.

Thanks,
kalyan.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77771633

78078951 almost 6 years ago

Hi,

I have modifed road classification to residential, these roads are not tertiary roads.

thanks,
kalyan.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78078951

78096923 almost 6 years ago

Hi,

Classification is wrong here, I have reverted your edits. These are clearly residential roads.

thanks,
Kalyan.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78096923

78100107 almost 6 years ago

Hi,

Good job adding address related data in this changeset, you have also deleted existing landuse features. Is there any valid reason behind this deletion?

thanks,
Kalyan.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78100107

70817834 about 6 years ago

Hi dornweg,

In the current changeset is there any specifc reason behind deleting the residential tag to this way(way/8603880). Accoriding to our internal traces road exist. Kindly re-look into this issue.

Thanks in advance,
Kalyan.

76808550 about 6 years ago

Hi Ginaro,

Apologies for my mistake, I should have checked at both ends of the segment. Thanks for the revert.

Regards,
Kalyan.

74504597 about 6 years ago

Hi Velella,

Good job editing footpaths near Rother. But, while editing, you have converted this way into path way/724787933 which is the only possible access road for nearby entities. Kindly verify this.

Thanks in advance,
Kalyan.

559174 about 6 years ago

Hi kevjs,

Thanks for your kind words. We are always happy work with local mappers like you. Thanks again.

Regards,
Kalyan.

47635055 about 6 years ago

Hi Mike Baggaley,

Good job mapping in UK.
way/16522484 You have modified access tag to the above segment 2 years ago, which is in conflict with our internal traces.

Our internal traces suggest vehicles can travel from Burton Street to Upper Parliament Street via mentioned segment.Could you please verify this edit again? Because of the current access tag, our drivers are taking long route via Peel Street.

Thanks in advance,
kalyan.

559174 about 6 years ago

Hi Kevjs,

Good job mapping in Nottingham and nearby.
way/16522484 You have modified access tag to the above segment very long ago, which is in conflict with our internal traces.

Our internal traces suggest vehicles can travel from Burton Street to Upper Parliament Street via mentioned segment.Could you please verify this edit again? Because of the current access tag, our drivers are taking long route via Peel Street.

Thanks in advance,
kalyan.

70206348 about 6 years ago

Hi Phil,

Thanks for your valuable inputs and reasoning. Since we are unsure of private tag, let's not edit it. I will delete the "motor_vehicle=no" tag so that people would be able to reach their houses. Hoping for local mapper response on the notes you have added.

Thanks again,
Kalyan.

70206348 about 6 years ago

Hi Jon and Phil,

Thanks for your responses and for adding note to address this issue. Is it okay to delete "motor_vehicle=no" tag based on latest imageries in which vehicles are present? We are happy to learn from local mappers.

Regards,
Kalyan.

75634950 about 6 years ago

Hi,

Good job editing in this vicinity. way/597500519#map=19/44.96690/-93.27351 could you please re-verify the status of this road. According our latest internal imagery construction is completed and now open for vehicles.

Thanks in advance,
Kalyan.

70206348 about 6 years ago

Hi Jonkrato,

Is there any specific reason behind adding motor_vehicle=no to this road? Motor vehicles can be seen in latest imageries.

Thanks in advance,
kalyan.