sskalyan's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 77404275 | almost 6 years ago | *road class |
| 77404275 | almost 6 years ago | Hi, Reverting your edits, classificatio to residential. thanks,
|
| 77406024 | almost 6 years ago | Hi, Reverting your edits, modified road class to residenntial road. thanks,
|
| 77603482 | almost 6 years ago | Hi, Road class is residential here, reverting your editd. Thanks,
|
| 77642423 | almost 6 years ago | Hi, Reverting your edits, these are residential roads. Thanks,
|
| 77770991 | almost 6 years ago | Hi, Reverted your edits, these are residential roads. thanks,
|
| 77771633 | almost 6 years ago | Hi, Reverted your edits, these residential roads. Thanks,
|
| 78078951 | almost 6 years ago | Hi, I have modifed road classification to residential, these roads are not tertiary roads. thanks,
|
| 78096923 | almost 6 years ago | Hi, Classification is wrong here, I have reverted your edits. These are clearly residential roads. thanks,
|
| 78100107 | almost 6 years ago | Hi, Good job adding address related data in this changeset, you have also deleted existing landuse features. Is there any valid reason behind this deletion? thanks,
|
| 70817834 | about 6 years ago | Hi dornweg, In the current changeset is there any specifc reason behind deleting the residential tag to this way(way/8603880). Accoriding to our internal traces road exist. Kindly re-look into this issue. Thanks in advance,
|
| 76808550 | about 6 years ago | Hi Ginaro, Apologies for my mistake, I should have checked at both ends of the segment. Thanks for the revert. Regards,
|
| 74504597 | about 6 years ago | Hi Velella, Good job editing footpaths near Rother. But, while editing, you have converted this way into path way/724787933 which is the only possible access road for nearby entities. Kindly verify this. Thanks in advance,
|
| 559174 | about 6 years ago | Hi kevjs, Thanks for your kind words. We are always happy work with local mappers like you. Thanks again. Regards,
|
| 47635055 | about 6 years ago | Hi Mike Baggaley, Good job mapping in UK.
Our internal traces suggest vehicles can travel from Burton Street to Upper Parliament Street via mentioned segment.Could you please verify this edit again? Because of the current access tag, our drivers are taking long route via Peel Street. Thanks in advance,
|
| 559174 | about 6 years ago | Hi Kevjs, Good job mapping in Nottingham and nearby.
Our internal traces suggest vehicles can travel from Burton Street to Upper Parliament Street via mentioned segment.Could you please verify this edit again? Because of the current access tag, our drivers are taking long route via Peel Street. Thanks in advance,
|
| 70206348 | about 6 years ago | Hi Phil, Thanks for your valuable inputs and reasoning. Since we are unsure of private tag, let's not edit it. I will delete the "motor_vehicle=no" tag so that people would be able to reach their houses. Hoping for local mapper response on the notes you have added. Thanks again,
|
| 70206348 | about 6 years ago | Hi Jon and Phil, Thanks for your responses and for adding note to address this issue. Is it okay to delete "motor_vehicle=no" tag based on latest imageries in which vehicles are present? We are happy to learn from local mappers. Regards,
|
| 75634950 | about 6 years ago | Hi, Good job editing in this vicinity. way/597500519#map=19/44.96690/-93.27351 could you please re-verify the status of this road. According our latest internal imagery construction is completed and now open for vehicles. Thanks in advance,
|
| 70206348 | about 6 years ago | Hi Jonkrato, Is there any specific reason behind adding motor_vehicle=no to this road? Motor vehicles can be seen in latest imageries. Thanks in advance,
|