OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
58488782 over 7 years ago

Dear apm-wa,

Thank you for your feedback. I changed my tagging for Serdar Ýoly to type 1 track with motor_vehicle=no and foot=designated. I did this for the following reasons:
1.) You wrote in the changeset discussion resp. in your message that the way "can not be used by motor vehicle" and "it should be designated as a footpath". I therefore assume that there is a corresponding prohibition sign.
2.) Serdar Ýoly is clearly visible on the aerial photo as a very well paved way with more than 5 m width.
3.) The tag path (highway=path) is used outside cities for narrow paths where 4-wheel vehicles can not physically drive.

Best regards,
sperlingskauz

54330975 almost 8 years ago

Dear Odewale Afees,
for your information: I deleted the double tagging high=unclassified, since there is already the tagging highway=unclassified, probably it was just a typo.
Regards,
sperlingskauz

45787376 almost 8 years ago

Dear muzirian,
for your information: I deleted the double tagging high=path, since there is already the tagging highway=tertiary resp. highway=residential, probably it was just a typo.
Regards,
sperlingskauz

48071431 almost 8 years ago

Dear tshedy,
for your information: I deleted the double tagging high=hedge, since there is already the tagging highway=residential, probably it was just a typo.
Regards,
sperlingskauz

55560735 almost 8 years ago

Dear Guy P,
for your information: I deleted the double tagging high=residential, since there is already the tagging highway=residential, probably it was just a typo.
Regards,
sperlingskauz

50237451 almost 8 years ago

Dear tambre,
for your information: I deleted „hight=0“ from Viljandi Jaani kirik because height=0 or ele=0 would not fit either.
Regards,
sperlingskauz

46219310 almost 8 years ago

Dear Nabeel Kadhim Abbood,
for your information: I have changed your tagging in highway=footway + bridge=yes + layer=1 for the bridge and highway=trunk + maxheight=5 for the two pieces of street under the bridge. For more information, please refer to bridge=* and
maxheight=* and crossing=* .
Regards,
sperlingskauz

50809669 almost 8 years ago

Dear NeemaAlphonce,
for your information: I deleted the double tagging high=residential, since there is already the tagging highway=residential, probably it was just a typo.
Regards,
sperlingskauz

33713925 almost 8 years ago

Dear yrtimiD,
for your information: I have changed your tagging est_widht in est_width for 2 footways, probably it was just a typo.
Regards,
sperlingskauz

42767310 almost 8 years ago

Dear hayashi,
for your information: I have changed your tagging hight=4 in height=4 for the city_wall, probably it was just a typo.
Regards,
sperlingskauz

40518819 almost 8 years ago

Dear Ro Sun,
for your information: I deleted the double tagging hight in 3 parts of the building, since there is already the tagging height and min_height, probably it was just a typo.
Regards,
sperlingskauz

51496791 almost 8 years ago

Dear tadanet3,
for your information: I have changed your tagging hight=10 in height=10 for the chimney, probably it was just a typo.
Regards,
sperlingskauz

52193799 almost 8 years ago

Dear iRewer,
for your information: I have changed your tagging hight=3 in height=3 for the fence, probably it was just a typo.
Regards,
sperlingskauz

47640909 almost 8 years ago

Dear alain2003,
for your information: I have changed your tagging hight=6 in height=6 for the steps, probably it was just a typo.
Regards,
sperlingskauz

50393595 almost 8 years ago

Dear Jole22,
for your information: I have changed your tagging hight=11m in height=11 for the cliff and the waterfall, probably it was just a typo. For more details please see height=* .
Regards,
sperlingskauz

43345566 almost 8 years ago

Dear TheCountN,
for your information: I have changed your tagging hight=4 in height=4 for the gas station, probably it was just a typo.
Regards,
sperlingskauz

42912840 almost 8 years ago

Dear Adib Yz,
for your information: I have changed your tagging hight=1 in height=1 for the 3 school buildings, probably it was just a typo.
Regards,
sperlingskauz

43830168 almost 8 years ago

Dear HamidReza Fallah,
for your information: I have changed your tagging hight=1 in height=1, probably it was just a typo. For more details see height=* .
Regards,
sperlingskauz

51895522 almost 8 years ago

Hi M!dgard,

In osm.wiki/NL:Key:addr I have not found anything about a regional agreement for Flanders. And "AGIV Flandern GRB" is exactly the name used in JOSM for the background map.

I was on holiday in Belgium last autumn and saw that there is still a lot to map. So I made additions and corrections wherever I was.

It is not fair not to publish existing agreements and demand them afterwards.

Please donate a sentence in osm.wiki/NL:Key:addr about the agreement for Flanders. And please open a ticket to JOSM, so that the name of the background map is corrected there.

Feel free to correct my "mistakes".

Regards,
sperlingskauz

46789942 almost 8 years ago

Hi cepesko,

ist dein Tagging man_made=bee_hotel für Knoten 4730763064 eventuell ein Insektenhotel?
Falls ja, dann ändere es bitte um in man_made=insect_hotel. Weitere Informationen gibt es auf der neuen deutschsprachige Wiki-Seite für Insektenhotels: osm.wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dinsect_hotel .

Falls es ein Bienenhaus mit Bienenstöcken ist, dann bitte ich dich, dich an der Diskussion auf der Seite osm.wiki/Proposed_features/apiary zu beteiligen, damit wir hier baldmöglichst ein einheitliches Tagging für Bienenhäuser haben.

Gruß,
sperlingskauz