Oops, sources should include web searches

Hi,

What was your data source for the trail names in this area? We received a report that at least some of the names you added are fake and possibly inappropriate.

Shawn K. Quinn
Data Working Group

Oops, I also had Bing imagery loaded for this changeset

Oops, I also had Bing imagery loaded for this changeset

Oops, I also had Bing imagery loaded for this changeset

Great, except they aren't tolled for HOV (2+), only for single occupied vehicles.

Why does a changeset for "updat[ing] tags" need to delete three different ways and over 20 nodes?

Is there specific street level imagery that would help and/or specific items that need to be surveyed? I live in this area.

Oops, this actually came more from a survey than Bing imagery.

Also, the comment is not helpful in the least. Obviously they are edits; the purpose of a changeset comment is to describe them so we have an idea what's been changed and possibly why.

Hi,

When converting a road to divided, please remember to update the lane counts and lane use. In addition to validator warnings being thrown when others map the area, note that GPS navigation software uses this data and will no longer be able to make logical lane choice recommendations if it is out of date or clearly erroneous. Thanks!

Hi,

I-45 is definitely *not* tolled anywhere outside the reversible HOT (formerly HOV) lane. Where did you get your information stating it was?

Hi,

Do you remember what this attraction is supposed to represent? It is in the middle of one of the parking garages surrounding The Galleria shopping mall and there is no obvious attraction visible from the satellite images.

Could you please read changeset/114752645 and clarify if you are part of the same group as gerardo1999 and Cullens? Thanks.

Shawn K. Quinn
on behalf of the Data Working Group

Could you please read changeset/114752645 and clarify if you are part of the same group as gerardo1999 and FLAMEEYES? Thanks.

Shawn K. Quinn
on behalf of the Data Working Group

Hi,

In the future, could you please confine your changesets to smaller areas and use more descriptive changeset comments?

Per the bounding box, it's obvious the changeset is (at least mostly) in the US so "america" really doesn't tell us anything new. Normally a changeset's bounding box should fit inside a single US state, maybe stretching across the border of two others if changes are near a border.

Hi,

Please do not change road names to full addresses. This is incorrect data and leads to incorrect labeling on the map as well as confusing data from navigation software. Thanks!

If this change set is about Madagascar, how is the southern US getting included in the bounding box?

Hi,

Please do not add turn restrictions where the restriction is implied by one-way traffic on the destination road. If it is later discovered that a road is one-way then the turn restrictions need to be deleted, as JOSM's validator among other QA tools will start flagging them as superfluous (i.e. extraneous junk).

Can something be done about these egregiously large changeset bounding boxes? This is insane.