Building outline with address restored in changeset/70889517. In the future please do not delete the whole building unless it's actually confirmed demolished, either by your own survey or satellite photos.

This change is to a road. How can it possibly be a "NEW STORE"?

Where did you get the address from?

Next time, please look for the feature mapped as a node first, and if it is, merge the information into the building outline.

@rene78 I am aware of these other tools, but they do nothing to actually fix the issue with OSM's own history button.

Please confine changesets to a smaller area. The bounding box for this changeset covers large portions of six continents (basically, half the world) and this makes it more difficult to see local changesets using OSM's history function.

Why does this changeset include a change in the northwestern US? This makes the bounding box cover half the world.

Eek. No idea why the bounding box on this one is so damn big.

What is your source for the data?

What exactly is this way supposed to represent? It was not tagged at all in the original edit?

Hi,

In case you are new to adding brand new roads to OSM, names should be spelled out, not abbreviated (i.e. "Seabiscuit Boulevard" not "Seabiscuit Blvd") as it causes problems with some text-to-speech software (including navigation programs which speak the directions).

Also you have this commented as "Tavola" but a good portion of these edits are actually in Lilliput Farms to the north. It would have been more helpful to see "Updated road layout in Tavola and Lilliput Farms subdivisions" or similar.

I am aware of the other tools to view OSM changesets. Honestly, most of the time I prefer to use the history button as it's always available and not on some other site I have to bookmark and copy/paste location info to. I am not ignoring your so-called "solutions". I am acknowledging them, and at the same time rejecting them as unacceptable. It's like asking me to wear earplugs because I can't stand the noise of someone belching loudly at the dinner table.

Please split this into multiple changesets for each region next time. There's no reason for the bounding box to include the entire continental US.

@DaveF that's exactly the problem. The bounding box covers the entire planet including most of the US, including my hometown where there are no edits. There is no reason to not split this up into separate changesets, say, one per country.

A better changeset comment would have been: "Added residential area near Brookshire" or even just "Added residential area". We can (usually) tell the area from the changeset bounding box (the orange rectangle enclosing everything that was changed when you view the changeset online).

name* (Apparently I was having a bad typing day)

This may have been better fixed by making the service road one way, thus making turn restrictions unnecessary. I am not out this way often but I will try to survey to confirm it's one way if I am.

Resolves note/916519

That tool is nice in some ways but it too has its shortcomings, such as making the left pane take up half the browser window, and I am not able to mouse over a bounding box or changed item to see which changeset it goes to. The first time I used it, I managed to get it to freeze the browser tab within two minutes. It's also another address to remember/bookmark that doesn't start with openstreetmap.org. It's still no excuse for editors being sloppy with changeset bounding box areas as a lot of people will still need to use OSM's own history function.

These should have been in separate changesets. The bounding box for this changeset stretches over greater Houston, TX, and several other states besides Oklahoma and Florida, making it more difficult to see local edits.