for anyone coming across this, it appears that the river - way/227691523 - is actually named the Meme River (ref: http://digitallibrary.usc.edu/digital/collection/p15799coll123/id/62299/rec/8 https://www.geonames.org/6856013/meme-river-forest-reserve.html

nice job on the edits; just a tip: the OSIP imagery 6inch imagery layer is a bit newer and better aligned than bing . you can access it in Id by pressing by `B`.

regards,
will.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89707168

hi,

welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for editing.

the man_made=works tag that you applied to way/826318059

is not a good description for that area man%20made=works

That area is very likely an office (I am local to the area and have been very close to physically)

Regards,
Will
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88000695

hi,

thanks for editing and welcome to openstreetmap.

As a clevelander and fellow openstreetmap editor, I have a couple suggestions:
- the OSIP 6 inch imagery layer is more accurate and sharper than maxar.
- You can improve the shape of a building to more closely match what it looks like within the editor, way/823995260

way/823999339/
are some examples that could be improved.

Could you clarify what the #bte means? The changeset comments let fellow users know what types of edits were made.

For example, for one of yours, it could be "adding buildings in parma using mapwith.ai"

lastly, if you're a part of an organized group editing, have your leader please review https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

otherwise, great work .

regards,
will

hi,

thanks for editing and welcome to openstreetmap.

As a clevelander, a couple suggestions:
- the OSIP 6 inch imagery layer is more accurate and sharper than maxar.

Could you clarify what the #bte means? The changeset comments let fellow users know what types of edits were made.

For example, for one of yours, it could be "adding buildings in parma using mapwith.ai"

lastly, if you're a part of an organized group editing, have your leader please review https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

regards,
will

hi, thanks for editing and effort the NPS boundary although I had a couple questions and concerns about it:

One is that the eastern area of CVNP (cuyahoga valley national park) extends into the bedford reservation; the bedford reservation relation/3956286 is not a part of CVNP, but is operated by
the cleveland metroparks, a local parks organization https://www.clevelandmetroparks.com/parks/visit/parks/bedford-reservation

Second is that a small sliver in northeast corner (notably the area northeast of canal road) is marked as being within the CVNP;
osm.org/#map=17/41.41867/-81.64094

I'm pretty sure that sliver isn't marked as being a national park land.

I'm aware that park land ownership can be very convoluted and complex so there may be some reasoning behind it. :)

If you could share the geojson/shapefile that you used as the import and provide a link where you obtained it from, that'd be greatly appreciated.

regards,
will from the cleveland area.

I saw the NAIP imagery and saw that the road was removed. thanks for the updat.e

Hi, thanks for editing. I was wondering what led you to delete to page avenue? It appears from the mapbox imagery that the street and elderwood both still exist.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85859336

hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your mapping edits!
Your edits so far are generally good (good observation on changing the McKinley Place from road to residential). I understand not wanting to split webb road; and this is sorta bug in iD the editor, but I fixed it for you so the road is now one way without splitting webb: and what I did was then drag the node (node/7442062287) over to the node where webb and northwood intersect, and iD merges them together, and deleted one of the node (since I moved them so close to each other); I hope that explanation was clear.

The new result is in
(changeset/84069186); now the entire western part of northwood west of webb is oneway. :)

Also, although the maxar imagery is pretty new there's another imagery layer (it's also available in the editor, iD) called 'OSIP 6inch most current' that has better resolution, you may find that easier to work with.

If you have any questions, feel free to message me, I'd be happy to help. Welcome again to OpenStreetMap from a fellow local.

Regards,
Will in Lakewood

oh, thank you for the notice, I was unaware of the new tag and I agree, it is probably appropriate for several of the the ways here.

hi, thanks for the update, including the details in the comment about the difference in imagery! If you have any questions about OSM, feel free to ask; have fun mapping!

cheers,
Will in lakewood.

hey, good to see you back mapping and thanks for your contributions. :)

Regards,
will in lakewood.

nice additions, thanks for the mapping!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82182987

hi, welcome to openstreetmap!

I am interested to hear more about your upcoming Asiatown mapping!

Regards,
Will in Lakewood

thanks for editing, but this should have been marked private since the surrounding roads connecting it are also marked as private. I've made this change.

Hi,
welcome to openstreetmap and thanks for adding the buildings; I made a small improvement to your edits, one of them was incorrectly tagged as being underground ;)

cheers,
will in lakewood.

hi, thanks for editing but please use the OSIP 6-inch aerial imagery for Cuyahoga County, it is currently the most up to date imagery for the county. It's available in the iD editor. https://github.com/osmlab/editor-layer-index/blob/927e7847d42e5a7c9e92ef5da94b06f97d5779cd/sources/north-america/us/oh/Ohio_OSIP_6in.geojson

welcome back to OSM :)

hi, i've been past that street dozens of times; it's a private driveway for that building and does not have a sign that it is a street; i've modified it to reflect the current situation on the ground.

way/652917665