skifans's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 100594287 | almost 5 years ago | I've removed the comment in: changeset/100657670 |
| 100657670 | almost 5 years ago | This changeset is in follow-up to discussion at: changeset/100594287 |
| 100594287 | almost 5 years ago | I'll defer to you - I only got as far as the wall with the private keep out sign (eastern end - node/7633403455) - and could only see one route continuing into the woods. I thought based on the heading it was the more Northerly of the 2 but may have been wrong. Incidentally the private keep out sign looked quite new, how long has it been there? If these routes have existed for some time might be worth a DMMO for public footpath to keep public access? |
| 97794287 | almost 5 years ago | Hi Paul, did you mean to add this with a public_transport:version=2 tag? Looks to a little sort of between 1 and 2 to me? Its mostly 2 but you've still get the forward/backwards roles which are not valid under V2: osm.wiki/Buses#Adding_streets_to_the_relation |
| 98042200 | almost 5 years ago | Sorry I've got this wrong, its signed as "5 Tons". Should it be "5 lt" based on osm.wiki/Map_features/Units#Explicit_specifications? Looks like without a unit maxweight=*?uselang=en Tonnes is the default? Although this whole Ton/Tonnes ect. is rather confusing! |
| 96683275 | almost 5 years ago | Source should be Ariel Imagery - not GPS |
| 88160742 | over 5 years ago | No worries, I've left the Common Garden Street stops as you put them, nice spot on them being incorrect. Not at all. |
| 88139375 | over 5 years ago | Hi,
|
| 86563220 | over 5 years ago | (sorry, mean Wray in comment) |
| 83080462 | over 5 years ago | Scrap that ^ |
| 83080462 | over 5 years ago | (Mean southbound) |
| 83055789 | over 5 years ago | See note #2147145 (note/2147145) |
| 56769615 | almost 6 years ago | Bit late but just confirming, yes the platforms are staggered (as currently mapped), and yes the bridge is still present. |
| 81168356 | almost 6 years ago | Rest of route added in changeset/81175550 |
| 81024640 | almost 6 years ago | Sorry, think I've fixed it. Not sure why that happened. |
| 64489670 | about 7 years ago | Cheers, thanks for pointing that out. |
| 64489670 | about 7 years ago | Don't know what came over-me there, yes your right residential is defiantly inappropriate. I think service looks better though, its only for access to the farm. Service is listed "Generally for access to a building, service station, beach, campsite, industrial estate, business park, etc." whereas unclassified is "Public access road, non-residential." and my view is the former fits better but happy to defer if there is something I have missed.
|
| 59568569 | over 7 years ago | Sorry, thank you for the information. Ill ensure I keep a look out, is there a different way this information should be dealt with? |
| 59401119 | over 7 years ago | Ahh, is it where I have split the road which had caused them. That makes sense. About the other tags, do you feel that this should be duplicated and have to/from tags added? If so is there an easier way rather then clicking through all of the roads again? |
| 52358249 | about 8 years ago | Its seems I have, fixing it now. Thanks |