OpenStreetMap
sjakobi's Notes
Notes submitted or commented on by sjakobi
| Id | Creator | Description | Created at | Last changed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3247848 | sjakobi | What is surface=natural supposed to mean here? Could surface=ground possibly be used instead?! |
|||
| 3244972 | sjakobi | surface=natural ist unkonventionell und deshalb nicht sehr hilfreich für's Routing. Kann stattdessen vielleicht surface=ground verwendet werden?! |
|||
| 3247155 | sjakobi | It's unclear what surface=2 is supposed to mean. It's used on some other ways nearby too. See https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1jMP. |
|||
| 3246209 | sjakobi | surface=2 is a very unconventional und unhelpful tag. Should be removed or replaced with a conventional surface value. |
|||
| 3246842 | sjakobi | Since the road surface was changed to asphalt, I suspect that smoothness=very_horrible is outdated now?! |
|||
| 3246824 | sjakobi | Die Kombination surface=asphalt mit tracktype=grade5 macht keinen Sinn. smoothness sollte ggf. auch aktualisiert werden. |
|||
| 3220010 | white_gecko | Unable to answer "What kind of building is this?" for way/135563888 via StreetComplete 43.2: Existiert nicht mehr |
|||
| 3247001 | sjakobi | Die Kombination aus surface=ground und smoothness=excellent wirkt äußerst fragwürdig. |
|||
| 3246853 | sjakobi | smoothness=very_horrible und tracktype=grade3 sind nicht richtig kompatibel mit der neuen surface=asphalt. Sollte überprüft werden. |
|||
| 3246877 | sjakobi | The combination of smoothness=very_horrible with surface=asphalt and tracktype=grade4 is pretty unusual. Could someone confirm that the smoothness and tracktype are accurate? |