Source is Bing/extrap

Oopsie-woopsies.

I accidentally fat-fingered enter while cleaning my keyboard, hence the malformed source 😢

In my defense, I based my edit off the existing [wiki recommendation for route directionals](osm.wiki/Route_directions). AFAIK this style has been okayed by the community. I’m a bit confused about how I’m erring here when the example I used 1) has been approved and 2) does the exact thing that I’m doing.

If this is egregious enough, then by all means, do correct my mistake. If you’d rather I do it, then sure, I can abide that.

State Highway 6 South is quite literally the signed name used in my municipality; since that’s at best regional, I’ve excluded it from the route. On the other hand, AFAIK Highway 6 South is an incredibly common way to address the south-bound route, common enough that there are entire stretches of the route named after that. I would *really* like to avoid starting an edit war over something as silly as this.

Other variants include 3227 Hwy 6 and 3227 SH-6 N (at least that I’ve seen). I’ve defined the names with the context of the whole mass automated “name≠description” debacle that I was very specifically trying to avoid 🥲

These are the actual, in-use names in the region; for example, the address 3227 State Highway 6 South (street name given to stretches of both Highway 6 North and Highway 6 South) is commonly truncated to 3227 Highway 6 or 3227 Highway 6 North.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165747728

Source is actually the website, but I forgor change 💀