seav's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 101287430 | over 4 years ago | I partially reverted this changeset because it mistakenly included TS Cruz's perimeter into the Las PiƱas relation. |
| 101290381 | over 4 years ago | I have reverted this changeset because it mistakenly included the whole TS Cruz perimeter into BF Homes Almanza's relation. |
| 101118731 | almost 5 years ago | I think this is incorrect. This relation you created includes the municipalities of San Vicente, Dumaran, and Araceli and not just Roxas. |
| 101118540 | almost 5 years ago | Hmmm. I previously modified the Palawan relation to exclude Puerto Princesa because the city is a HUC and is therefore outside the jurisdiction of the province despite being its capital. |
| 71747552 | almost 5 years ago | This changeset turned a long waterway (way/27663262) into a culvert. Probably around 98% of this waterway is not actually covered or underground. |
| 99105699 | almost 5 years ago | This changeset deleted the Philippine baselines and I have reverted it here: changeset/99905587 |
| 98219661 | almost 5 years ago | Should this be discussed with the wider community? Personally I prefer leaving out any "Street" suffixes. And consumers can use heuristics to assume that any road name without a street-like suffix like "Avenue" or "Boulevard" to have "Street" as the implied suffix. (But need to take care of special cases like "Paseo de Roxas" in Makati which does have a Spanish prefix. Or the "Calles" in Taal, Batangas.) |
| 98949569 | almost 5 years ago | This has been reverted here: changeset/99077115 Reason: Municipal waters (R.A. 8550) is part of the jurisdiction of LGUs. |
| 98955661 | almost 5 years ago | Also partially reverted here: changeset/99019678 |
| 98955661 | almost 5 years ago | This has been reverted here: changeset/99018564 Reason: Municipal waters (R.A. 8550) is part of the jurisdiction of LGUs. |
| 98959297 | almost 5 years ago | This has been reverted here: changeset/99017055 Reason: Municipal waters (R.A. 8550) is part of the jurisdiction of LGUs. |
| 98897523 | almost 5 years ago | This changeset is reverted here: changeset/99011722 Municipal waters is included in the jurisdiction of LGUs as stated in
|
| 98411809 | almost 5 years ago | See discussion on Skyscrapercity. QBEx's status is still unclear https://www.skyscrapercity.com/threads/quezon-bicol-expressway.1904233/page-13 |
| 97589641 | almost 5 years ago | Changeset tag is wrong: "Lapu-Lapu" should be "Mandaue" |
| 97589421 | almost 5 years ago | Changeset tag is wrong: "Lapu-Lapu" should be "Mandaue" |
| 97588772 | almost 5 years ago | Changeset tag is wrong: "Lapu-Lapu" should be "Mandaue" |
| 97588721 | almost 5 years ago | Changeset tag is wrong: "Lapu-Lapu" should be "Mandaue" |
| 96479659 | almost 5 years ago | I think it is much better to use standard keys that are used worldwide such as designation=* instead of using invented local keys such as place:PH=*. |
| 91831888 | about 5 years ago | These were originally mapped as buildings until I pointed it out on Telegram. |
| 87238580 | about 5 years ago | Can you provide proof that long lengths of the SLEX extension is actually being constructed? You have marked the portion going towards Lucena as highway=construction. Unless the right-of-way has been fenced off and cleared, then I don't agree that highway=construction is the correct tag. |