This changeset has been reverted. This user has the habit of making fantasy edits.

This changeset has been reverted.

This changeset has been reverted. This user has the habit of doing fantasy edits.

This changeset has been reverted. This user has a habit of doing fantasy edits.

This change has been reverted. This user has a habit of doing fantasy edits.

I reverted this changeset via changeset #71395444.

It makes no sense for Meralco to "expand" Lopez Building.

(Note: When the multipolygon relation was created, the cemetery-related tags remained on one of the outer ways. I've fixed this.)

Minor correction: To square areas/buildings, the new iD keyboard shortcut is 'Q' instead of 'S'.

Reverting this changeset. The parking lot that this changeset deleted is still operating (I'm parked there right now).

We really should not be using "construction" keys or values for things that are not *actually* being constructed. If the bridge will be recreated in the future, then it is a simple matter to just draw a new bridge or undelete the old bridge and then re-tag it as needed.

If this will indeed be implemented, you can use conditional restrictions: osm.wiki/Conditional_restrictions

Something like:
oneway:conditional=yes @ (Sa,Su,PH)

It is OSM practice to only split roads if there is a physical barrier, not a legal barrier.

If there is no `aeroway=aerodrome` tag near there, then why should they be confused by a name such as "Paliparan"?

Seconding TagaSanPedroAko here. Use the most recognizable "official-sounding" name (no abbreviations like "Rd.") for the name=* tag. For the official name, use nat_name=* or official_name=*.

This is the reason why EDSA is currently tagged name=EDSA (and EDSA Extension), not name=Epifanio de los Santos Avenue.

I repaired the boundary relation here: changeset/68848604

If you visit the site and what is actually being constructed, it is currently just a flyover (and not a viaduct) over SLEX connecting C-5 and C-5 extension. Since both C-5 and C-5 Extension are currently not motorways, tagging this short flyover as a potential motorway is inaccurate.

See my reply to the other changeset.

The nodes and ways are actually still in the database but marked as visible=no (in the user interface, they are labeled as "deleted" but they are not actually deleted).

Once the other construction phases have been started, we can then "undelete" them. The advantage of this is that these ways do not interfere with existing data and newbies using iD do not accidentally connect other stuff like buildings and POIs to these proposed roads.

AFAIK, only the very northern part of the subway (~3 stations from Mindanao Avenue) is actually *currently* being constructed. So it is incorrect to state that the *whole* line is already under construction.

It is not an widely established practice, but many mappers use the admin_level=* tag to represent what level of government a particular feature applies to such as government offices and not only for boundaries.

Here's an example of a traffic sign that uses admin_level=6:
node/5138691464