OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
70341363 over 6 years ago

IIRC, "papercut" refers to "death by a thousand (paper) cuts". Basically, we tag these as minor errors on the map that nobody really bothers to fix. We (OSM PH) have since expanded this concept to flag things that need urgent/systematic fixing.

70265885 over 6 years ago

I did not refer to any imagery and did not need to. I merely fixed changeset/70236153 to preserve data history. There should not be any (substantial) change in the geometry that was introduced by changeset/70236153.

69637964 over 6 years ago

This changeset has been reverted. This user has the habit of doing fantasy edits.

69638044 over 6 years ago

This changeset has been reverted. This user has the habit of making fantasy edits.

69639332 over 6 years ago

This changeset has been reverted.

70077909 over 6 years ago

This changeset has been reverted. This user has the habit of doing fantasy edits.

70111121 over 6 years ago

This changeset has been reverted. This user has a habit of doing fantasy edits.

70111316 over 6 years ago

This change has been reverted. This user has a habit of doing fantasy edits.

70111422 over 6 years ago

I reverted this changeset via changeset #71395444.

It makes no sense for Meralco to "expand" Lopez Building.

70942002 over 6 years ago

(Note: When the multipolygon relation was created, the cemetery-related tags remained on one of the outer ways. I've fixed this.)

66056026 over 6 years ago

Minor correction: To square areas/buildings, the new iD keyboard shortcut is 'Q' instead of 'S'.

69272705 over 6 years ago

Reverting this changeset. The parking lot that this changeset deleted is still operating (I'm parked there right now).

69834056 over 6 years ago

We really should not be using "construction" keys or values for things that are not *actually* being constructed. If the bridge will be recreated in the future, then it is a simple matter to just draw a new bridge or undelete the old bridge and then re-tag it as needed.

69417734 over 6 years ago

If this will indeed be implemented, you can use conditional restrictions: osm.wiki/Conditional_restrictions

Something like:
oneway:conditional=yes @ (Sa,Su,PH)

69214644 over 6 years ago

It is OSM practice to only split roads if there is a physical barrier, not a legal barrier.

68968622 over 6 years ago

If there is no `aeroway=aerodrome` tag near there, then why should they be confused by a name such as "Paliparan"?

68968622 over 6 years ago

Seconding TagaSanPedroAko here. Use the most recognizable "official-sounding" name (no abbreviations like "Rd.") for the name=* tag. For the official name, use nat_name=* or official_name=*.

This is the reason why EDSA is currently tagged name=EDSA (and EDSA Extension), not name=Epifanio de los Santos Avenue.

68820151 over 6 years ago

I repaired the boundary relation here: changeset/68848604

67812772 almost 7 years ago

If you visit the site and what is actually being constructed, it is currently just a flyover (and not a viaduct) over SLEX connecting C-5 and C-5 extension. Since both C-5 and C-5 Extension are currently not motorways, tagging this short flyover as a potential motorway is inaccurate.

67812837 almost 7 years ago

See my reply to the other changeset.