Great! Thanks!

Correction: should be gns_uni=*, not gns_unit=*

Hi JAT86,

Is there any particular reason why you restored/added the gns_classification=* tag? Unless the node also has the gns_unit=* tag, this tag is useless for data-matching purposes. Also the gns_*=* tags are not documented in the OSM Wiki and were a remnant of place name imports done in the past.

In addition, referring back to the GEOnet Names Server (GNS) is not particularly useful for OSM's purposes. GNS is useful as a source of data but not something that should be relied on as stated by the list of caveats on the OSM Wiki: osm.wiki/GEOnet_Names_Server#Caveats

It would actually be more useful to link the place=town nodes to their corresponding Wikidata items using wikidata=* and maybe also tag them with ref=* using their PSGC id.

@GOwin, I see that this changeset is over 4 years old, but is there any reason why you deleted node/945582522 which is the place=suburb node for Betis, Guagua? Betis is a significant district of Guagua anchored by Betis Church, a designated National Cultural Treasure. Note that Betis is not a barangay on its own. (Looking back at it, not sure though if place=quarter may be more appropriate than place=suburb.)

Why are you adding name:it tags to points of interest that do not really have Italian names?

The building is already correctly named as "Burgundy Corporate Tower". What you have done is to rename a school inside the building incorrectly.

Hi! The correct tag for the Aquabest POI that you added is shop=water.

You removed the building=* tag but you forgot to building:levels=* tag.

Hi!

Thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!

May I confirm what type of businesses you have added? You have marked them as tourism=artwork which is for sculptures, murals, and other pieces of public art, and not for printing services.

Hi!

Thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!

May I confirm that this edit where you deleted a path is correct? I believe this path is for the pedestrian underpass going under Makati Avenue. Does this underpass no longer exist?

If the highway is not actually *currently* being constructed (or is still in the proposed state), marking it as highway=construction is not appropriate.

Even then, only the sections that are being constructed should be marked as highway=construction and not the whole highway.

OK. This node's position now looks really weird:
node/734948145

What imagery offset did you use for Bing?

@GOwin, well I would use place=neighbourhood for places that feel like a neighborhood and not necessarily 100% residential. Like Salcedo Village in Makati.

I am not sure about Photon but Nominatim does index named landuse=residential areas. Case in point: https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=77697295

Or if the gated community is "small" enough, landuse=residential is enough.

Hi! May I know what these highway=steps are in the Camp Aguinaldo Golf Course? Please take note that highway=steps is meant to be used for stairs and stairways, such as the ones at the ends of pedestrian overpasses.

This is a pretty messy changeset that messes us routing at the Amorsolo exit of Skyway.

Is Pasong Tamo really divided in this area? I do not recall that there is a center island for Pasong Tamo starting from Dela Rosa until Pasay Road.

Sorry, but a pedestrian crossing is not tagged as a highway=pedestrian.

I will be reverting this changeset because it messed up the boundaries of Quezon City, Pasig, and Mandaluyong.