Hi, thanks for the updates! One request -- when deleting closed businesses, please just remove the business related tags (instead of the entire object) if possible, otherwise the underlying address (which is still usually valid) gets deleted too. I've already restored the two I saw. Thanks again!

Hi, welcome to OSM! Maybe someone has already also commented, but please upload your changes for each small area (such as a neighborhood) before starting edits in a place far away. It keeps the area covered by the changeset smaller, and more relevant to a local area. Thanks!

Hi, thanks for the update! Just one request: the underlying address is still valid, so instead of Deleting the entire node, please Modify it instead, removing just the business-related tags (I think that’s available in OsmAnd). I’ve already put just the address back here, so no need to do anything. Thanks again!

Hi, can you please explain your changes further? I think it was more correct before the change to landuse - the entire block is covered by a building, in some places two stories represented by building:part (even the parking lot that appears in imagery is on top of a grocery store).

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the changes -- your houses look really good. One tip is, after drawing and tagging it as a building, you can press 'q' (or select and right-click to get a menu) which will square up the building and make it look nice (sometimes it will ignore wonky angles, sometimes not). Anyway, something to try if you like, there's always 'undo'. Thanks again and hope to see more edits!

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit! Really useful! Just so you know, I just expanded the "NE" on the name you added since writing all of those out is the norm (easier to contract than expand automatically). Thanks again, hope to see more edits!

This was a fun one, thanks for the note!

Hi, though this is an old edit, just letting you know that I re-added the node to keep the address (still valid) and the node history. I then removed just the obsolete business tags. Your more recent changes look pretty good, please keep it up! Thanks.

Hi, thanks for the addition! I added an access=private tag, and moved the name (which was more of a description) to the description key. Thanks again!

OK, I think you're correct - I missed the motor_vehicle=yes tag you added! That combination logically disables all access, and then enables just one. Thanks for clarifying, hope to see more edits!

Hi, welcome to OSM! Thanks for the edits - the only thing I'd ask about here is the access=no tag, since it implies it is off limits to the public. Perhaps there is a reason you added it? Thanks again!

Hi, thanks for fixing those addresses! I went ahead and expanded out a couple of the street name abbreviations even further (like SE to Southeast) which appears to be an OSM convention (that you probably already know about, couldn't hurt to mention my additions). Thanks again!

Hi again, once again appreciate the edit for the business. Some of us have updated your change -- breaking out the address into parts (which is the typical convention), and expanding street name abbreviations. You can take a look at it now to see the result. Once again, thanks, knowing about the business at all is important!

Hi, thanks for the edits - welcome back! Really useful to know this changed -- I modified your changes a bit, but tried to keep what you added and keep history. I moved the address tags from the nearby node to this node since they're the same feature/age, moved the disabled: tag to the key side (disabled:amenity, not disabled:pub). Thanks again!

Hi, welcome to OSM, and thanks for the edit! Looks like you did a great job editing this -- thanks for leaving the address tags. I think the only suggestion I'd made is removing the cuisine=pizza tag. Otherwise, looks perfect! Thanks again.

Hi, thanks for the edit -- though it looks like there are a number of edits to make here. If it's too much, let me know, but I would select Bing Imagery in the iD editor (it's current), shift it to match the surrounding buildings, then adjust the parking lot/old buildings to match the imagery. I know that's a lot, so will send a separate note so we can discuss. Thanks again!

Hi, welcome to OSM, and thanks for the edits! I didn't look at all of your changes, but looks like you're off to a great start!

Hi, thanks for the edits! Your buildings all look pretty well drawn, I might suggest using the "squaring tool" right after you've drawn it and tagged it as a building. You can right click the building and select the button from the popup menu, or just press'q'. This makes all the corners 90 degrees (if already close). Thanks again!

Hi, welcome to OSM, and thanks for editing! I see that you've added foot=no to the street here, but from imagery there appears to be a sidewalk alongside the street, so that doesn't appear to be correct, and should be removed. Can you please explain your change? Thanks.

Hi, thanks for the edit! In order to be consistent with topical mapping convention, just have a couple of suggestions: request expanding the street name abbreviations (SE -> Southeast, CT -> Court), and changing the street type to "residential", as "living street" is a specific classification of street design (see wiki for info). Thanks again!