Ingress protection, an international standard, https://www.mpl.ch/info/IPratings.html

Cheers. It's a sprinkler booster apparatus controlled from a fire hydrant booster panel. Not an individual sprinkler but the appliance control for linking sprinklers to / from mobile fire appliances (trucks) and hydrants

Thank you!!!

The rails with bicycle yes are a combined bidi rails plus way for emergency, rail service motor vehicles bicycle and foot

I did check the wiki before using ramp=both which appeared as suggested. I'm using it to code the presence of what are called "pram ramps" in Australian design. 1 m wide useable ramps from a raised footpath to the road level.

In this section of road the road and the railway are separated. A short way to the east the situation is different and they're conjoined. I'll edit that section to show that it is one way that is bidi two track rail and a bidi two lane road.

With being bold, I mean please edit my tagging of that crossing structure I mapped so I can model off your tagging!

No no, it's entirely my fault here. I'm using a mobile device while surveying and missed the tagging when reading the wiki. Fixing

Feel free to be as bold as you enjoy and should I be able to make any sense of your tagging I will model it.

Wiki>
Tagging crossings as ways

Some mappers tag a way Way segment of a highway=footway or highway=cycleway that crosses multiple roads and/or railways with crossing=traffic_signals to indicate that there is only one traffic light controlling the cyclist or pedestrian, to avoid multiple nodes Node being tagged as crossings.

Similarly, a way segment of a highway=footway is being tagged crossing=uncontrolled + crossing_ref=zebra to indicate its full length.

Disadvantage: Please note that this mapping style makes it difficult for routers and navigation systems to recognise that there is a crossing for pedestrians or cyclists along the road, since there is no special crossing node Node on the route being evaluated.

This is an existed supported tagging system. It is specified in the English language wiki

And that ontology is neither mandatory nor represents the situation on the ground that this is a single object with length

Firstly it isn't wrong tagging. The ontology specified within the wiki discourages it because some route mappers are programmed by unaware groups.

Secondly the crossing is a way. It has a length, commencement, terminus and is not a series of separate nodes. Either the road and two rail lines must be crossed as a whole by foot traffic, or the crossing must not be attempted. There is no halt point between the intersection of the first and second railway, nor between the second railway and the road.

uninterruptable power supply. The first hit after commerce spam in google.

I did look at the amenity's wiki page first, and there's nothing about coding external theatres.

Thanks for the spelling correction.

Sydney cbd mobile survey, concentrating on bicycle dismount versus end sup. No end SUP signs. Railways act only used on concourse. Dismount sign has no lawful power to stop cyclists riding in nsw on an sup. It is a hazard sign like slow children crossing or dip

There are no police or atc giving an lawful instruction outside signage to this effect. Basic difference between physical infrastructure, legal infrastructure, and suitability for purpose

bicycle:yes means a legal reason to be able to ride
bicycle:designated means a specific legal designation

All lanes are packed:yes. Bus lanes are pav:designated. It matters because you can't legally climb Williams street to park in cbd in lanes 1-2 but are required to use the Australian road rules bicycle lane.

Thanks for alerting me to my error. I have an offline editor at home and can correct this for nodes.

I wish I had the mapping time to go back and measure the widths :) But I'll keep it in mind and find a "meter" rod somewhere on my body for future mapping.

Can you add this to the wiki? We can use cycleway:lane:bicycle=designated & bicycle:no for legal bicycle lanes, and cycleway:lane:bicycle=yes & bicycle=yes for marked cycle shoulders to represent the legal restrictions that vary between marked shoulders and by the law cycle lanes.

Except they're not marked cycle lanes

http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/nsw/consol_reg/rr2014104/s153.html

>4) A
"bicycle lane" is a marked lane, or the part of a marked lane:
>(a) beginning at a bicycle lane sign applying to the lane, or a road marking comprising both a white bicycle symbol and the word lane painted in white

These lack the word "Lane" or the sign

I agree, I firmly remember discovering my error after upload and chasing down nodes with source:maxspeed applied to them to correct.