sakudo's Notes
Notes submitted or commented on by sakudo
| Id | Creator | Description | Created at | Last changed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 256093 | sakudo | Although (apparently) the administrative border and the Rio Tocomar are the same (the border is defined by the river apparently), here we have problem: Physically, the river disappears (or is only seaonsally active, but across another site); hence river and border should be separated here. The river going south to the factory / mine, the border to the east, later again following the river... |
|||
| 3400713 | q5gads4 | Die Postbank existiert hier (wie die Postfiliale) nicht mehr. Node node/5679797312 einfach löschen? |
|||
| 848908 | sakudo | oneway=yes does not make sense here. Local knowledge needed for fixing it. |
|||
| 492168 | sakudo | sind die beiden Wege verbunden? Bahnübergang? |
|||
| 916147 | sakudo | Bus |
|||
| 916148 | sakudo | Bus 250 252 253 543 Bushaltestelle |
|||
| 2692166 | sakudo | missing path towards Saulcy |
|||
| 708852 | sakudo | Bus 253 isoliertes Stück |
|||
| 902827 | sakudo | In this area, buildings are tagged using a relation. Preferred tagging is:
Here we have line segments that belong to a relation and the relation is tagged as building. Sometimes even different buildings belong to the same relation (which does not make sense as they are separate buildings). Needs "logical" clean up. |
|||
| 492194 | sakudo | Exakter Verlauf des Fußweges hier zu validieren. Der alte Forstweg der Ohe entlang wurde auf jeden Fall "zerstört" (überwachsen, unpassierbar durch Grabungen). |