OpenStreetMap
rskedgell's Notes
Notes submitted or commented on by rskedgell
| Id | Creator | Description | Created at | Last changed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2899353 | Mikey Co | The choice of tagging along here isn't great, as you have a pedestrian street running through a pedestrian area, and hence vanishing! |
|||
| 3210606 | onosm.org submitted note from a business:
|
||||
| 4302469 | rskedgell | The footway here might be more useful if it were actually connected to the service road. via StreetComplete_ee 58.0 |
|||
| 4135492 | rskedgell | Unmapped steps x10 via StreetComplete_ee 56.1 Attached photo(s):
|
|||
| 4134646 | rskedgell | Unable to answer "What type of barrier is this?" – Barrier (Unspecified Type) – node/536821177 via StreetComplete_ee 56.1: Railings, not a bollard Attached photo(s):
|
|||
| 3301880 | rskedgell | Unable to answer "What kind of memorial is this?" for node/4908592617 via StreetComplete 45.2: War memorial WWI? Attached photo(s):
|
|||
| 4202485 | rskedgell | There seems to be rather a lot of cycle parking for somewhere cycling is supposedly prohibited. via StreetComplete_ee 57.0 Attached photo(s):
|
|||
| 4202476 | rskedgell | Cycle stands via StreetComplete_ee 57.0 Attached photo(s):
|
|||
| 4202473 | rskedgell | If cycling is prohibited here, it seems odd that there is no signage to confirm this and that cycle stands have been provided. via StreetComplete_ee 57.0 Attached photo(s):
|
|||
| 4202463 | rskedgell | Crossing is a toucan nor pelican. This is because it is part of a shared foot and cucle route, not foot only. A pedestrian fingerpost does not imply a prohibition of cycling. via StreetComplete_ee 57.0 Attached photo(s):
|
