Reverted in changeset/175916881

Reverted in changeset/175916789

Reverted in changeset/175916479

Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please note that access tags in OSM reflect the verifiable legal position, not your subjective opinion.
access=*

You can give pedestrian routers more information which might help. The 50 mph speed limit is already tagged, but you could also survey and add:
sidewalk=*
verge=*
lanes=*
lit=*

Reverted in changeset/175916430

The museum has already been added to OSM, but only 2 months ago: node/13256051041

This is the second time you have added a duplicate of Moco. Deleted in changeset/175865528

That's great, thanks for confirming.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding your business. I've converted the tags which you used to ones which are more likely to be recognised by data consumers.

It may be worth taking a look at the list of documented service types on the wiki and adding those which are missing. I've only added service:vehicle:towing=yes
service:vehicle:*=*

Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Thanks for adding this, but Buckland Primary School has been in OSM since 2012.
way/162902344

When you make an edit which isn't directly related to HotOSM, please could you replace the generated changeset comment with something actually describing the change(s) you're making?

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Does the deleted "Woodland Walk" path ( way/1099920175/history ) no longer exist at all, or is it no longer part of a signposted walk at Uppark and/or currently closed to the public?

If it's closed to the public, using an access tag would be the usual way to map this.

There's more information at osm.wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/National_Trust_Paths

Thanks again.

These are bus lanes, which are mapped using tags on the road. Don't add pretend roads where no physical separation exists between lanes and don't add fictitious guided busways anywhere, ever.

It isn't a bus guideway. Even on real ones, the guided section doesn't extend into bus stattions.

Please don't tag for the renderer. It's a bus rapid transit scheme, not a guided busway.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and many thanks for spotting and correcting that.

I think the earlier mapper misused highway=bus_guideway because it's rendered on the "default" OSM Carto map style and the correct highway=busway unfortunately is not. This is an example of tagging for the renderer and the other mapper really ought to have known better - see osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

I've tweaked the tags on the construction section and the access tags on the rest of that part of Fastrack.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The museum has already been added to OSM, but only 2 months ago: node/13256051041

Corrected in changeset/175714422

Although a previous edit changing it to a guided busway was wrong, highway=busway is the correct tagging here. It was probably mis-tagged as a guided busway and keeps getting changed to unclassified or service because those are rendered in the "default" OSM Carto map tiles and busway is not. Before changing it again, please see osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

There is a lot of misunderstanding about access tags and signs.

A blue dedicated bus route sign (TSRGD diagram 953) or a no entry sign with exceptions prohibit all vehicles except those expressly permitted. That is represented by vehicle=no . If a motor vehicle (only) prohibition was intended, then a different sign would be used (diagram 619).

There is no UK traffic sign specifically allowing PSVs, so psv=yes is almost always incorrect. It's not quite a synonym for bus=yes and shouldn't be used when the signage specifically refers to buses.

It may not be a *guided* busway, but assuming that the "bus only" road markings clearly visible in aerial imagery at both ends are still current, the access tagging you'd want is:

vehicle=no + bus=designated

The tagging you have used turns it into an unclassified road open to *all* general traffic, which would cause problems for routing software based in OSM if that's not the case.

(Review requested)

Thanks for updating this.

For the private section, it should be highway=service rather than highway=secondary (used for B roads).

(Review requested)

That looks fine, thanks for updating it.