(Review requested)

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding this.

It's fine as it is, but if you wanted to add a little more detail to help routing software, you could add surface and incline tags. Links for the tags which might be useful are below. This is entirely optional, so please do not feel as if you need to change anything.

surface=*
smoothness=*
tracktype=*
incline=*

Thanks!

(Review requested)

Thanks for adding this, it looks fine to me.

You could add designation=permissive_footpath if you wanted, but it's not essential. The documentation of the tag is at designation=*#United_Kingdom

Are you sure that they shouldn't be highway=construction + construction=residential?

The roads may not yet be open to traffic, but both are in OS Open USRN (with Designated Street Name records) and OS Open Names, including some of the geometries you deleted.

USRN 1104116 - Andrew Cairns Drive
USRN 1104117 - Maud Allen Way

That's a relief, thanks.

@Nathan_A_RF this looks like a StreetComplete problem rather than user error. It might be worth raising an issue on Github if it happens again, but at the moment GB taginfo looks fine - https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/keys/maxspeed:type#values

Thanks for fixing that!

You might find this Overpass Turbo query helpful:

// Fractured multipolygons touched by @mapeing / @demise123
rel
[type=multipolygon]
(if:id() != 6038068) // Great Britain
(if:count_by_role("outer") > 1)
(if:count_by_role("inner") == 0)
(uid_touched:21804930);

(._;>;);
out meta;

Changing it to building=apartments kept iD happy changeset/162303813

Thanks for fixing it.

It's likely to be related to this https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-edits-by-one-busmiles-user-in-the-uk/116376

I can't see any signage suggesting that these streets should be tagged as highway=living_street, which in the UK would be a TSRGD diagram 881 Home Zone sign (like this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Home_zone_Higham_on_the_Hill_Nuneaton_Dec_2019.jpg ).

I think this is likely to be a problem with how StreetComplete interpreted your response to the AddMaxSpeed quest, rather than something you did. I'll restore the streets to highway=residential.

Hi @swappa, many thanks for that.

Please could you explain what benefit this has and point me to where this mechanical edit was discussed?

There is no reference to direction=* being deprecated for public_transport=stop_position on the wiki public_transport=stop_position

There may also be consumers of OSM data for purposes of non-bus routing which might find the presence and direction of a stop_position node useful. Those consumers should not need to consume and process every bus route relation to which the node belongs in order to infer the direction. That is why I have tended to add this and why I object to its removal without prior discussion.

Please could you open a discussion about this at https://community.openstreetmap.org/

Thanks!

Thanks, and apologies for missing it.

I've got at least two bus route relations to repair as well. The mapper who introduced all the pretend dual carriageways created a few gaps, which I'm afraid I've added to.

What are you trying to map here? There clearly isn't a huge building here, so I'll delete the building=yes tag.

I'll also remove the incorrect layer=1 tag, as adding layer=* in response to the iD editor's warnings is only appropriate where features really are at different heights. That is often the case for bridges, tunnels and canopies (building=roof), but much less common otherwise.

I'll leave the geometry and other tags intact.

Thanks. I'll try to walk the Strood/Rochester - Rainham bit soon and check the Saxon Shore way signage. I haven't been there for 10+ years, but I have a feeling that it may be a little bit like the Capital Ring and only signed on one side of the road in places.

That's great, thanks for providing confirmation so quickly.

Hi @vineela and thanks for the response. Please could you also ask the mapper to reply to my comments on changesets creating or reversing one way streets. These are not necessarily incorrect, as I realise that your mappers have access to driver feedback in addition to the sources available to me. In general, changes to one way working require traffic orders which are usually (for permanent changes made by London councils) published in The Gazette under the OSM-compatible Open Government Licence.

^ Changeset comment should read "updated sidewalk and highway tagging in Gillingham"

No response to changeset comment, reverted in changeset/162200736