OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
124816262 about 3 years ago

According to the local authority, the part of Norland Road (way/606519484) changed from cycleway->footway is "a pedestrian and cycle zone".

The Kensington and Chelsea (Prescribed Routes) (No. 2) Traffic Order 2022
https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/4027262
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124816262

125225715 about 3 years ago

Thanks @Fizzie41

125233688 about 3 years ago

Why did you disconnect way/237330195 from Holland Park Avenue? Was changing a cycleway to a footway in changeset #125225715 deemed insufficient?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125233688

125705132 about 3 years ago

Also just noticed: a correctly mapped puffin crossing node/1674808373 deleted and replaced by node/9995372381 (crossing=marked).

125907490 about 3 years ago

At the junction of Harrow Road/College Road, I see that you deleted an ASL and replaced a correctly mapped and surveyed crossing. While this damage has been repaired, the local mappers who are cleaning up your mess are entitled to an explanation of what you're doing and why you're doing it.

changeset/129976770

125705132 about 3 years ago

@Derick I've started threads about these in Talk-GB and Talk-GB-London, if you'd like to join in.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125705132

131371732 about 3 years ago

Thanks!

124816262 about 3 years ago

@trigpoint Did you ever get an answer?

124772739 about 3 years ago

Is the entire length of the kerb way/933011649 really lowered? How could you possibly tell from Bing aerial imagery?

124724597 about 3 years ago

Drawing a decorative sidewalk around a block is usually detrimental to pedestrian routing.

125056021 about 3 years ago

Why add layer=-1 to footways/sidewalks which are clearly not subterranean?

125225715 about 3 years ago

Looking at your other edits breaking cycleways in the area, this is starting to look deliberate #DWG

125225715 about 3 years ago

Changing segment way/1070108461 in the middle of a cycleway to a footway/sidewalk broke cycle routing. We tend not to have sidewalks in the middle of, and perpendicular to, the highway.

131336219 about 3 years ago

Thanks, but highway=cycleway already implies foot=yes unless explicitly tagged otherwise. The presence of segregated=* also makes it fairly clear that it's shared.

A blue dotted line on the OSM Carto map tiles does not imply that the way is not shared, or that pedestrians do not have priority.

Please consider reverting your change.

osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
osm.wiki/Cycling_in_the_United_Kingdom

131181781 about 3 years ago

Thanks!

127841222 about 3 years ago

A list of the words, which might be slightly rude in some contexts, which have been deemed "profanities" would be helpful.

131204455 about 3 years ago

Oh joy, OSM Carto's maintainers seem unlikely to support highway=busway any time soon. Never mind, it was only approved in 2020.

Changed back to highway=service in
changeset/131207705

131187337 about 3 years ago

@yasslay I suspect that this may be a StreetComplete issue of not confining changesets to an appropriately sized bounding box, rather than user error.

See:
https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/4582

44957126 about 3 years ago

The fence had been removed by late 2019, however there is still a kerb and Seething Lane should not be connected to the cycle track or carriageway of Byward Street, just the sidewalk.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=4049675791760653

112378644 about 3 years ago

No problem. I've changed it to bridge:structure=arch.