rskedgell's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 124816262 | about 3 years ago | According to the local authority, the part of Norland Road (way/606519484) changed from cycleway->footway is "a pedestrian and cycle zone". The Kensington and Chelsea (Prescribed Routes) (No. 2) Traffic Order 2022
|
| 125225715 | about 3 years ago | Thanks @Fizzie41 |
| 125233688 | about 3 years ago | Why did you disconnect way/237330195 from Holland Park Avenue? Was changing a cycleway to a footway in changeset #125225715 deemed insufficient?
|
| 125705132 | about 3 years ago | Also just noticed: a correctly mapped puffin crossing node/1674808373 deleted and replaced by node/9995372381 (crossing=marked). |
| 125907490 | about 3 years ago | At the junction of Harrow Road/College Road, I see that you deleted an ASL and replaced a correctly mapped and surveyed crossing. While this damage has been repaired, the local mappers who are cleaning up your mess are entitled to an explanation of what you're doing and why you're doing it. |
| 125705132 | about 3 years ago | @Derick I've started threads about these in Talk-GB and Talk-GB-London, if you'd like to join in.
|
| 131371732 | about 3 years ago | Thanks! |
| 124816262 | about 3 years ago | @trigpoint Did you ever get an answer? |
| 124772739 | about 3 years ago | Is the entire length of the kerb way/933011649 really lowered? How could you possibly tell from Bing aerial imagery? |
| 124724597 | about 3 years ago | Drawing a decorative sidewalk around a block is usually detrimental to pedestrian routing. |
| 125056021 | about 3 years ago | Why add layer=-1 to footways/sidewalks which are clearly not subterranean? |
| 125225715 | about 3 years ago | Looking at your other edits breaking cycleways in the area, this is starting to look deliberate #DWG |
| 125225715 | about 3 years ago | Changing segment way/1070108461 in the middle of a cycleway to a footway/sidewalk broke cycle routing. We tend not to have sidewalks in the middle of, and perpendicular to, the highway. |
| 131336219 | about 3 years ago | Thanks, but highway=cycleway already implies foot=yes unless explicitly tagged otherwise. The presence of segregated=* also makes it fairly clear that it's shared. A blue dotted line on the OSM Carto map tiles does not imply that the way is not shared, or that pedestrians do not have priority. Please consider reverting your change. osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
|
| 131181781 | about 3 years ago | Thanks! |
| 127841222 | about 3 years ago | A list of the words, which might be slightly rude in some contexts, which have been deemed "profanities" would be helpful. |
| 131204455 | about 3 years ago | Oh joy, OSM Carto's maintainers seem unlikely to support highway=busway any time soon. Never mind, it was only approved in 2020. Changed back to highway=service in
|
| 131187337 | about 3 years ago | @yasslay I suspect that this may be a StreetComplete issue of not confining changesets to an appropriately sized bounding box, rather than user error. See:
|
| 44957126 | about 3 years ago | The fence had been removed by late 2019, however there is still a kerb and Seething Lane should not be connected to the cycle track or carriageway of Byward Street, just the sidewalk. |
| 112378644 | about 3 years ago | No problem. I've changed it to bridge:structure=arch. |