For additional context, concerns raised in December 2023:
changeset/145632324

The problem is that almost every edit you have made has been incorrect and has had to be corrected by other mappers. OpenStreetMap has data consumers other than Busmiles.uk users, who rely on the data being correct and usable.

Please could you explain how deleting the cycleway and sidewalk tags here is a "correction"? Was it suggested by a QA tool, or something else?

I'm curious about why changing bus=designated to bus=yes is a "correction"? Was this suggested by a QA tool, or prompted by something else?

You have been asked repeatedly and politely not to map for the renderer, but persist in making exceptionally poor edits which damage the OSM database.

Thank you for confirming that you do actually read changeset comments and have simply ignored them out in the past.

I've repaired High Street. You can have little idea how bitterly I resent wasting my time fixing damaging edits like yours.

Again, please don't map for the renderer.

Lanes, without physical separation other than paint, are mapped as tags on the same way.

Carriageways with physical separation are mapped as separate ways.

Please read the articles linked below. osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
osm.wiki/Busmiles.uk

Hi, the value of the addr:city tag in UK addresses is usually the post town. Local authority names are not part of postal addresses. See osm.wiki/Addresses_in_the_United_Kingdom

Another mapper broke the access tagging on the bus loop in changeset/159276247 - now fixed so that it's bus=designated + vehicle=private (per the road markings visible in the aerial imagery).

Thanks for adding the one way tag.

Hi,

On the bus-only bit of Kestrel Road, access="no, bus=yes" won't mean anything to data consumers and motor_vehicle=designated means that access is legally designated for ALL motor vehicles, not only for designated motor vehicles. Adding foot=no means that the intersecting paths cease to be routable, as does the part of it which has a sidewalk/pavement.

Repaired in changeset/164235134

If you lose information about the number of lanes, turn lanes and a mandatory cycle lane, is it really a "correction"?

Repaired in changeset/164234942

Done in changeset/164195817

I was surprised that the adjacent crossings have zebra-like markings, but aren't zebra crossings.

(Review requested)

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your edit looks fine to me, thank you for improving the map.

It may take a couple of weeks for your changes to propagate to routing software, as their update frequencies vary.

Repaired in changeset/148776942

Repaired in changeset/164182888

Repaired in changeset/162872173

Repaired in changeset/162872031

I'll update it in the next day or two.

Deleting something added correctly by a competent mapper and replacing it with lower quality mapping is essentially vandalism and far more detrimental than your usual habit of adding duplicates. Reverted.

Repaired in changeset/164181748