It's not the official website of the bridge, as it does not have one. Removed.

* how LLCS operates

Unfortunately, you appear to have misunderstood how LLCS exists and failed to check the actual signage in place.

For example, the signed restriction on Tower Bridge is a prohibition of goods vehicles exceeding 18 tonnes, i.e. goods vehicles with a maximum gross weight between 3.5 and 18 tonnes are permitted.

I can't find this order online, but it seems odd that a 20mph speed limit order should introduce both an absolute 7.5t weight limit and an HGV ban. Do you have a link to the original traffic order?

Please could you try to keep the extent of your changesets to a smaller geographical area? Ones with a bounding box which spans several continents (in this case W Africa to NE Asia) are very difficult to review.

osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Have all the parking spaces and the trees *really* been removed? If not, why have you deleted them from the map?

The pub is already mapped as a node separate from the building outline.

node/419960967

Thanks! I must shoot some Mapillary imagery around the Necropolis next time I'm up in Glasgow.

Stop trying to cheat at Pokemon Go and grow up.

It's been mapped for 15 years.
way/27051948

Duplicate deleted.

Dragged node repaired in changeset/150789041

Unfortunately, removing the highway=unclassified tag from part of Hedley Avenue effectively removed it from the map. Private roads are still roads, so this tag should not be removed. I am not sure what "no highway status" means, but Hedley Avenue is in OS Open Names and has a Designated Street Name USRN, so it will also be on OS maps and derived products.

Also, I can see from Bing's street side imagery that the entrance to Hedley Avenue is signed "private road". This means that it is privately owned, not that access is private. In this case, ownership=private + access=destination is probably the best tagging.

OSM data is used by navigation software, users of which would reasonably expect to get them to the gates of the premises to which they are travelling.

You may find the documentation for these tags on the wiki helpful:
highway=*
access=*
ownership=*

I have restored Hedley Avenue and added a little more information in changeset/150765919

Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

As Cody Road and the raising bollards near the roundabout already have access=permissive, there shouldn't be a problem here. It might be more appropriate to file a bug report with the game developer. If that doesn't work, you could ask for help on the OSM Community Forum.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/

Adding motor_vehicle=yes is problematic, as an access value of yes implies that there is a legal right of way here, which isn't the case.

I've updated the access tagging through the gated Prologis Park section and added tagging to show that it's privately owned/operated.
changeset/150764479

Could you check the Facebook URL for Kambi's? I think you may have accidentally pasted in your OSM user name.

You appear to have tagged a section of High Street as foot=no in response to a StreetComplete task asking "Are pedestrians forbidden to walk on this road here?"

I have checked the available Bing Streetside and/or Mapillary imagery for evidence that there really is a (signed) pedestrian prohibition here. I cannot see any TSRGD diagram 625.1 "pedestrians prohibited" signs on the imagery, so do not believe that a prohibition exists and have therefore reverted your edit.

The wiki states that access tags reflect legal access. Subjective opinions about whether it would be pleasant, a good idea, safe, etc. for a particular transport mode are not relevant to legal access.
foot=*

As real pedestrian prohibitions on public roads other than those tagged as highway=motorway or motorroad=yes in the UK are quite rare and are always signed, this quest is probably better left disabled.

Non-extent restrictions removed in
changeset/150706766

Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The building tag should only be applied to the outlines of actual buildings, not the entire parcel of land.
building=*

The layer=-1 tag tells routers and renderers that features are at different levels.
layer=*

The historic=manor tag is probably better applied to the building itself (in this case, the Grade I listed Fairlawne), not the grounds.
historic=manor

As Fiarlawne is presumably still a private residence, rather than a building operated by National Trust, English Heritage, etc., the original tagging of the surrounding area as landuse=residential was probably correct.

The formal gardens within the estate could be added as leisure=garden + access=private if you wanted more detail than just a pale grey area.
leisure=garden

If you would like any help with this, please feel free to ask.

Rather than deleting the end segment of Palmers Drive, it would have been better to split the way and tag it appropriately. In this case, it would probably be highway=service + service=driveway + access=private. If there is a gate, you could add it as a node tagged with barrier=gate + access=private.

You may find this page on the wiki useful to explain the rationale for not deleting private features.
osm.wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

Thanks for updating these.

As you asked for a review, I would suggest that rather than adding disused:shop=yes as a new tag, you add the disused: lifecycle prefix to the existing shop or amenity tag.

The documentation on lifecycle prefixes is on the wiki here:
osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding these speed limits.

In addition to the maxspeed=60 mph tag, as there is a national speed limit sign, you could also add maxspeed:type=GB:nsl_single
maxspeed:type=*#United_Kingdom

It's not essential to add it and your tagging is fine as it is, but some data consumers may find the extra tag useful.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please try to keep your edits to a smaller geographical area and use a more meaningful changeset comment.

You may find the documentation linked below helpful.
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Changing highway=footway to highway=path does not "correct" anything, it simply makes access more ambiguous. Please read:
osm.wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#United_Kingdom

I have restored the original tagging on these paths in changeset/150395654

You may wish to gain a little more experience before deciding, on your first edit, that all the other mappers who edited the footpaths in Nonsuch Park tagged them incorrectly.