OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
49084736 over 8 years ago

Thank you for informing me, I see that you added it already.

49084736 over 8 years ago

Hi Chris Fleming!
Thank you very much for contributing with OSM, I removed it because it was a Profanity name, if you confirm that the valid name will proceed to reverse my changeset.

Have a good day

48770775 over 8 years ago

The descriptions that are attached are images that show footpath signals, so change it by generic locations, with respect to the names we will have to wait for the local mappers.

48770775 over 8 years ago

Hi Alecs01!

Leave a note so that they can confirm the existence of the signaling nodes.

48725168 over 8 years ago

Hi rooxx!

Thank you very much to contribute with OSM, I see that in this changeset you added a building and a park, you could confirm its existence and which source of image you used, in Bing they are not visible.

48599243 over 8 years ago

Hello again!

You made the same changes as in changeset/48569637, you modified a good geometry for another one that clearly intersects with paved areas (parking), otherwise to delimit area you can use barrier=* are tips for good mapping.

have a nice day.

48569637 over 8 years ago

Hi Tarble_Fu!

Thank you very much for contributing on OSM, in this changeset I can see that you eliminated several 'service=parking_aisle' highways that added based on the satellite image and to the categorization according to the existing documentation: service=parking_aisle , You eliminated 2 clearly differentiated buildings and instead added 1, you eliminated a landuse that has good geometry according to the satellite image and added another that has different geometry. Having all this, proceed to the correction of your editions keeping your the data.

48401453 over 8 years ago

changeset/48428786

Done, have an excellent day.

Att: Pavel

48401453 over 8 years ago

hi Dalkvist !
Thank you very much for contributing with OSM,
Right now I will proceed to reverse my changes, guide me according to the satellite image I am sorry, please you can modify both geometry and data according to local knowledge.

47880351 over 8 years ago

Hi Diógenes de Sinope!

I read your comment on this change, I will send you more details on why you remove this tag, check your Imbox.

47784123 over 8 years ago

Hi TueroDaniel!

Thanks for your contribution with Openstreetmap, but do you have any source or photos that guarantee that these buildings were demolished?
While I restore these buildings.

Have a good day, pavel.

47425755 over 8 years ago

changeset/47456036

47425755 over 8 years ago

Bonjour Dilys
des excuses était une traduction littérale, en ce moment je fixe

46759934 almost 9 years ago

Hi John Sinclair Thanks for contributing with Openstreetmap, but I found that you added objects that are not visible in the satellite image that you used, osm does not use private sources or any other type of resource that is not free use, delete water = pond because of this, I will reverse my change If it has sources or photographic resources of the existence of said object.

46263761 almost 9 years ago

Hey, 나린한울! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)

46242912 almost 9 years ago

Hi YSJM!, in this changeset you deleted several school buildings without specifying details of said action, your comment was add building. You can reverse this changeset please.

46264858 almost 9 years ago

Hey, 오민석! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)

46265106 almost 9 years ago

Hey, 오민석! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)

46038916 almost 9 years ago

Hey, oruk09! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)

46023195 almost 9 years ago

Hey, REMIND! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)