OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
32793634 over 10 years ago

abbafei, I'm curious as to why you marked this section as closed too? As far as I can tell, this part is still open for the jughandle movement from US-22. Plus, in Bing Imagery, you can see the 'road closed' barrier on the other segment blocking it off, but not blocking off this one. Plus, I seem to recall this being open when I went past it along US-22 at the beginning of August '15, but it was night time, so I can't be 100% sure. But I don't seem to remember any 'ROAD CLOSED' blockades at the traffic lights, or the lights being turned off as I think they would need PennDOT's permission for that part.

34144759 over 10 years ago

Add these changesets as well too. changeset/34144759 & changeset/34581478

34144759 over 10 years ago

changeset/34532178 & changeset/34537712 We're also talking about this type of tagging for toll booths on [talk-us] if you want to talk about it there as well before doing any changing/reverting so that everybody is on the same page.

34370264 over 10 years ago

This changeset has been reverted in changeset/34570113.

changeset/34570113

34372585 over 10 years ago

This changeset has been reverted in changeset/34570113.

changeset/34570113

34370264 over 10 years ago

I'm curious, but why are you adding 'FUT I-99' tags to the ref tags along these ways?

There are no 'Future' shields for I-99 posted, and I highly doubt PennDOT will be added any soon. The future route of I-99 may be defined, and in some rare places have an occasional 'I-99 Future Corridor' sign, however, that doesn't qualify it to be added into the ref tags yet since it isn't posted.

34372585 over 10 years ago

I'm curious, but why are you adding 'FUT I-99' tags to the ref tags along these ways?

There are no 'Future' shields for I-99 posted, and I highly doubt PennDOT will be added any soon. The future route of I-99 may be defined, and in some rare places have an occasional 'I-99 Future Corridor' sign, however, that doesn't qualify it to be added into the ref tags yet since it isn't posted.

34467034 over 10 years ago

This changeset has been reverted in changeset/34569484.
changeset/34569484

34467140 over 10 years ago

This changeset has been reverted in changeset/34569484.
changeset/34569484

34467140 over 10 years ago

I'm curious, but why are you adding 'FUT I-99' tags to the ref tags along these ways?

There are no 'Future' shields for I-99 posted, and I highly doubt PennDOT will be added any soon. The future route of I-99 may be defined, and in some rare places have an occasional 'I-99 Future Corridor' sign, however, that doesn't qualify it to be added into the ref tags yet since it isn't posted.

34467034 over 10 years ago

I'm curious, but why are you adding 'FUT I-99' tags to the ref tags along these ways?

There are no 'Future' shields for I-99 posted, and I highly doubt PennDOT will be added any soon. The future route of I-99 may be defined, and in some rare places have an occasional 'I-99 Future Corridor' sign, however, that doesn't qualify it to be added into the ref tags yet since it isn't posted.

34144759 over 10 years ago

He's now doing this on I-90 and I-87 in NY/MA. :( See his latest changesets.

34502766 over 10 years ago

Can you please provide your source for some of these road name changes?

32678437 over 10 years ago

This is obviously a one-way, not an 'impossible' one. The person just forget to add a way 'inside' of the car wash to continue routing. Thus, you're deleting perfectly valid data here.

34358905 over 10 years ago

See comments about this here: changeset/34237498

34237498 over 10 years ago

Well, I waited over 6 days for a response back from Matt1993, got nothing here. Had to act on the surgical revert before too many conflicts arose making it hard to do. Meanwhile he's still been editing in OSM during the time between the comments left here, so he's had time to leave a comment here...... Surgical revert has been done in changeset/34358905. changeset/34358905

25739566 over 10 years ago

That part of this changeset has been undone in changeset/34295451. changeset/34295451

25739566 over 10 years ago

I just noticed in this changeset that you added 'ref' tags for I-99 between Musser Lane & I-80 along US-220/PA-26 (one example: way/11833467 Version #12). Have you been to this area before? There are several 'TO' tabs above any I-99 shields in this area from the WB I-80 off ramp to Musser Lane. Plus there is a clear END shield for I-99 going NB @ Musser Lane (I have a personal picture of it). That's also where the first SB shield is located. Can you explain why you added it on a segment that isn't part of I-99?

34269993 over 10 years ago

Would it be possible to try to limit these types of changesets to just a single country?

34269993 over 10 years ago

maggot27, can you please try to make 'smaller' changeset areas? Ones that span the ocean always trigger in my RSS feed of my local area, even if there is nothing changed there.