rickmastfan67's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 27993951 | about 11 years ago | Well, the only reason I mentioned Murray Avenue is because of the solid yellow line all the way up to Wilkins. Usually, that means it's normally a tertiary highway unless it's a highway into a business park (normally 'unclassified' unless it's a thru route). |
| 27993951 | about 11 years ago | Ok, I think I'm done. lol. I'll be awaiting your response. :) |
| 27993951 | about 11 years ago | Now, with Murray Avenue, why just turn a small segment into tertiary? I think that could have been easily upgraded all the way to Wilkins Ave. |
| 27993951 | about 11 years ago | Now with Centre Avenue, that's also a weird place for it to change classifications. Maybe we should just upgrade Centre all the way Downtown to 6th? Agree? |
| 27993951 | about 11 years ago | As for O'Hara Street, you have to admit, that looks like a really weird place to end a secondary road at. Think it probably should have stayed as a territory highway instead. |
| 27993951 | about 11 years ago | As for Fifth Ave, why stop @ Halket Street? If it's really primary, I would think it would make it to the ramp to PA-885 (Boulevard of the Allies), and then change back to secondary there. |
| 27993951 | about 11 years ago | As for Braddock Avenue, I'll give you it as primary, but only between PA-8 & I-376. South of the Parkway, I think it should have stayed as secondary. |
| 27993951 | about 11 years ago | I thought I went over with you that the Blvd of the Allies was only secondary after PA-885 left it. :P |
| 27855344 | about 11 years ago | No problem man! |
| 27855190 | about 11 years ago | Now connected in Changeset: 27855344. changeset/27855344 |
| 27855190 | about 11 years ago | Don't forget to connect the ramp to I-10 so it can be used. ;) |
| 27825195 | about 11 years ago | I'm sorry, but I'm going to be reverting this changeset to properly tag this since we don't tag highways as 'highway=path' for when they are closed for construction. That and also to restore the segments of highway to the CR 525 relation. This has been fixed in changeset/27827248. changeset/27827248 |
| 27732906 | about 11 years ago | Little Brother, is it possible that you could try to keep these types of changesets limited to one continent or even smaller areas? It makes it sometimes impossible for local mappers to double check if your changes are correct since the OSM RSS feeds give any changeset that has a bounding box that enters a smaller area that a user may be watching, even if there aren't any changes done inside said small area. Would make it easier for me to double check my local area when changes are truly done here in the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA area. Thanks again! :) |
| 27623684 | about 11 years ago | Little Brother, is it possible that you could try to keep these types of changesets limited to one continent or even smaller areas? It makes it sometimes impossible for local mappers to double check if your changes are correct since the OSM RSS feeds give any changeset that has a bounding box that enters a smaller area that a user may be watching, even if there aren't any changes done inside said small area. Would make it easier for me to double check my local area when changes are truly done here in the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA area. Thanks again! :) |
| 27639252 | about 11 years ago | ediyes, is it possible that you could try to keep these types of changesets limited to one continent or even smaller areas? It makes it sometimes impossible for local mappers to double check if your changes are correct since the OSM RSS feeds give any changeset that has a bounding box that enters a smaller area that a user may be watching, even if there aren't any changes done inside said small area. Would make it easier for me to double check my local area when changes are truly done here in the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA area. Thanks again! :) |
| 27654401 | about 11 years ago | Test comment request via GitHub. https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/860#issuecomment-68004445 |
| 27601646 | about 11 years ago | When you mean 'closed', is it closed to all forms of traffic? If so, that should be tagged as 'access=no' instead of 'motor_vehicle=no'. |
| 27414605 | about 11 years ago | FYI, but you broke Forbes Ave in this changeset by accident. You made it oneway on a small segment that the traffic goes both ways. I've fixed it in changeset/27547864. ;) |
| 27176394 | about 11 years ago | Just a quick reminder for ya abbafei, but when you add the 'turn:lanes' info to a way, don't forget to add the lane count at the same time. ;) |
| 27345778 | about 11 years ago | Also, if you're using the pictures from AARoads to add the 'destinations', please properly source them instead of just saying 'survey'. |