Thanks, looking at these images, construction seems to be ongoing to the left pretty much up to the roundabout - https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1277585273166386 , https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=952713332430452 .

Also, along Lubānas iela, it's ongoing right up to the edge of the street - https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=126500963740001 .

Perhaps construction transcends the boundaries of that one parcel?

Hi, given that the changeset message mentions a proprietary map provider, please note that it is not allowed to take any information from JS maps.
In case any information remains in OSM from that provider, it should be re-surveyed from valid sources, or removed.

Hey, vēl daži centi :)
Parasti jau nevajag ļoti garus komentārus, pietiek ar dažiem vārdiem, kas būs dažas, ne daždesmit sekundes.
Mums dažreiz var šķist, ka mūsu rediģēšanu citi īsti pat nepamana, bet Latvijas kopiena aug, un biežāk sanāk saskarties ar citu kartētāju izmaiņām.
Izmaiņu apraksti, kaut pāris vārdi, var noderēt citiem kopienas dalībniekiem - un tad jau laika ieguvums ir tajā, ka viņiem ir lielāka skaidrība par mūsu paveikto, un visi kopā mēs ietaupām laiku.

Anrij, starp citu - liels paldies par burvīgajiem papildinājumiem :)
Varbūt ir iespēja pievienoties Latvijas kopienas jaunajam čatam, kur būtu iespēja apspriest daudz ko ar OSM saistītu?
https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com

Burvīgi, liels paldies :)

Removed that tag.

Heya, thank you for the great map improvements :)

In this changeset, some name=* tags were added to buildings - but those were just addresses.
In OSM, address tags are structured in addr:street and addr:housenumber tags, among others.
Names are used only for objects that actually have names.

I've removed addresses-as-names from some buildings, and if you spot any other places like that, please feel free to remove them as well.
In Latvia, address data is imported from official VZD data, thus any address related issues are best discussed in the community, for example, the Signal group: https://signal.group/#CjQKIBQDZFRYENhgTzY0czaSnYxt6-NCXdW5Rp2o6144bO4wEhCUSXKPmsjKnTbzUgLj0MpL .

Thank you again for improving the map - if any questions arise, please don't hesitate to ask them here or in the group chat :)

Hi, thank you so much for the map improvements. The road classification change unclassified->track would need community discussion and consensus, though - I've reverted this changeset for now.

Additionally, in this changeset alt_name and isolated_dwelling tags were removed (this got reverted in bulk for now).
What was the reasoning behind that?

Please note that this is in no way indicating that the changes are good or not good, the main concern is the need to discuss mass changes.

Happy mapping :)

Sveiki boomboom14, liels prieks par kartes papildinājumiem.
Būtu ļoti derīgi atbildēt uz HellMap komentāriem te un pie citām izmaiņu kopām - vai būs iespēja drīzumā pārlūkot komentārus un atbildēt uz tiem?

Liels paldies par datu papildināšanu :)

Sveiki Leicha, liels prieks par kartes papildinājumiem.
Būtu ļoti derīgi atbildēt uz HellMap komentāriem te un pie citām izmaiņu kopām - vai būs iespēja drīzumā pārlūkot komentārus un atbildēt uz tiem?

Liels paldies par datu papildināšanu :)

Yeah, so I was told, and shown a photo of a wooden bridge :)

I doubt my residential area change made a difference here - it actually had started rendering as expected before the change, I just had not refreshed it all.
Given the complexity of that multipolygon (just look at the number of inner ways), I'll just be glad it looks mostly OK now :)

Seems to be rendered as expected even before my latest changes, though.
The multipolygon is crazy, not seeing anything obvious that could have affected this.

Thank you so much for spotting this.
The overlap causing this seems weird, as the residential area isn't a member of the multipolygon.
I've removed the overlap anyway, let's see whether it helps any.

There's a relatively fresh sign one building there with the name, but overall it seems likely that this will turn into a mostly summer house area. keeping it "residential" might indeed be the best option right now.

That "attraction" seems wrong, haha. As a minimum, it's likely "loc_name" :)

This added way/1069549979 , but it's not quite residential landuse, filled with building=cabin .
Looking at the landuse and leisure tag wikipages, cannot find anything better, though.
Maybe tourism=camp_site fits, but it could mislead tourists, as it doesn't seem to offer anything short-term.
The official name at least for a part of this is "Atpūtas bāze "Kalngale"" ( https://carnikava.lv/jaunumi/17-pasvaldiba/4220-pazinojums-par-detalplanojuma-projekta-nodosanu-publiskajai-apspriesanai-un-atzinumu-sanemsanai-nekustamajam-ipasumam-atputas-baze-kalngale ), mapped so.

Great, thanks :)
I usually leave such tiny islands/islets untagged, but either way seems fine.

Perhaps way/1028666803 should be place=islet, or not have place tag at all?
place=island#When_to_avoid_place=island

Sounds good, thanks.

Harrr - well, I did add a bicycle parking stand and surface for all the serviceways ;)
More micromapping possible almost always (surveillance cameras? lamp posts?), but from the dedicated survey point of view, I'd say this is good enough.

I guess I kept living_street classification from this original way when I was splitting it: way/989378384/history .
As it's all work-in-progress there, I'm fine with either classification :)