Ah, thanks - was tabbing too quickly through the input fields.
Fixed now.

Hi and thank you for the map improvements.
In this changeset, way/910683506/history was added as highway=residential.
Given that it is marked as private (can be seen in Mapillary images), I've changed it to highway=service and access=private.

Hi, thank you for the recent map improvements in Latvia (which also includes at least Bolt002, 009 and 010).
In osm.wiki/Organised_Editing/Activites/Bolt , it is stated that "We are constantly in contact with the local community through the local talk list", but there does not seem to be any recent communication on this in the talk-lv mailing list.

Is there some thread I have missed there?

Heya, usually I start with LĢIA ortophoto (recently also added in iD index, https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-lv/2021-January/006198.html ), and compare with Maxar layers (usually more recent imagery but needs manual alignment), sometimes also with the LIDAR surface model, available at https://www.lvmgeo.lv/dati .

Perrrrfect, thank you - glad I didn't just delete it :)

Heya, don't see this shop in Mapillary images or ortophotos - what was it, where is it located?
node/2140260603/history

Hi, this changeset has added multiple strange footways that do not seem to match surface model / ortophotos:
osm.org/#map=16/57.8047/25.2223

Also a footway named "Rūnnu ZĪmes tak":
way/579496738

What are these, what's the source, and where do the names come from?

This changeset damages pharmacy data for the 3rd time.
Reverted in #94951717.

Sveiki, kāds ir datu avots šim objektam?
way/794405569

Izskatās pēc bijušās dzelzceļa līnijas atrašanās vietas, bet šobrīd vismaz konkrētā posma rietumpusē laikam nav pat path, kur nu vēl track...

Hi Asumarin, thank you for your contributions.
Unfortunately, there are several issues with this changeset.
a) This is an undiscussed mass edit.
b) This breaks data by incorrectly changing amenity=pharmacy into amenity=veterinary. I have reverted this changeset.

I also noticed that you are doing a large number of mass edits in many countries, many of them being disputed - and receiving no responses: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=9644791 .

While we value all contributions to OSM, could you please pause any mass edits and go over https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines ?

Please do not resume editing until the organised editing guidelines are fully implemented.
If there are any questions about the guidelines or the implementation, please feel free to ask in public forums or send me a private message, and I'll be happy to help.

Super, milzu paldies par uzlabojumiem :)

Hi there, thank you for the map improvements.
I traced a few buildings and a parking lot in this area, as well as moved your office to where I believe it belongs (the building, not the parking lot). Please let me know if I got the building wrong.
Additionally, I removed the description of the node, as it was more like an advertisement - in OpenStreetMap, such information is not collected. Verifiable, objective information is collected - and your office is now mapped, which is great :)

Thank you again for the improvements, and please feel free to expand from this, if mapping seems interesting enough.

Skatos, esi bijis šajā reģionā pāris mēnešus pēc manis, un tik smuki sazīmējis dižkokus :)
Vai pareizi saprotu, ka šie ir divi atsevišķi dižkoki?
node/6720621816/history
node/6720621827/history

Abiem arī pieliku natural=tree.

Haha, that's wonderful - and you kept all the object history, that's one well done import :)

Thank you so much for the map improvements and this notice.

Heya, looks like you removed that way - thank you for looking into it :)

Great, thank you for the map improvements :)

They seem to be a local, but they did not identify their interest further.
Do you have a chance to survey this location (and perhaps even upload Mapillary imagery)?

Hi Natfoot, thank you for the great improvements.
A user is reporting that the footway way/243471032 does not exist.
If you have recent on-the-ground knowledge that it actually still exists, I'll remove it next week.

Neat, that makes sense (and the fence would be great to keep in the map). Thank you for the attention to detail.
BTW, various places could be photographed with the Mapillary application, then a link to the image would clarify things immediately.

Thank you for clarifying.
I assume the fence is perpendicular to the footpath then - not connecting two paths?
If some segments can be drawn reasonably accurately, no need to delete them - incomplete data is still better than nothing.
Thank you so much for the great improvements :)