1. accurate boundaries for Chandler, AZ

    Closed
    #75033399 46 37 1398 0

  2. accurate boundaries for Chandler, AZ

    Closed
    #75033391 160 300 0 0

  3. accurate boundaries for Chandler, AZ

    Closed
    #75033234 489 146 0 0

  4. Fix addressing for Square Michelet, Marsailles, due to a question asked in #osm IRC channel

    Closed
    #75028623 16 22 0 0

  5. reverting myself... these relations do not reflect the actual boundaries of the subdistricts

    Closed
    #74943069 0 2 0 0

  6. Is in North Delhi, never trust Wikipedia

    Closed
    #74938717 0 1 0 0

  7. Karol Bagh is an administrative subdivision of Central Delhi, so admin_level=6

    Closed
    #74938407 0 1 0 0

  8. add is_in

    Closed
    #74938314 0 1 0 0

  9. Civil Lines is an administrative subdivision of Central Delhi, so admin_level 6 is correct

    Closed
    #74938298 0 1 0 0

  10. This node (Delhi) was a duplicate of node 316416994 and screwing up addressing

    Closed
    #74938014 0 0 1 1

  11. fix this nonsense, using a relation just breaks things

    Closed
    #74836130 0 1 1 0

  12. Unglue all Chandler AZ boundary ways, to prepare for fixing

    Closed
    #74833720 226 46 0 0

  13. tags on city boundary ways

    Closed
    #74833511 0 8 0 0

  14. clipping sections of Chandler boundary apart for fixage

    Closed
    #74833176 9 7 0 0

  15. City limits of Carefree AZ, which were absent

    Closed
    #74831618 142 61 219 0

  16. place=town tags on both boundary relation and node for Cave Creek so Nominatim will link them correctly

    Closed
    #74830491 0 2 0 0

  17. accurate boundaries for Cave Creek, AZ

    Closed
    #74830289 83 76 279 0

  18. fix nodes I accidentally dragged

    Closed
    #74795827 0 13 1 0

  19. attempt to fix addressing

    Closed
    #74795415 0 2 0 0

  20. improved road centerlines for Rio Crossing - better placement of turning circles

    Closed
    #74795360 0 181 0 0