Merci!

Hi Antonr,
thanks for your recent contributions to OpenStreetMap.
Regarding you changes on the shelters, you used the unclear and undocumented booking=yes.
Could you please have a look on the key and values of reservation=? I think this would suite that use case much better.
It"s affecting the shelters:
node/513286967
node/513286960
node/9945542287
node/9945542288
node/513286973

Thanks!
redd

Hi Gustry,
thanks for your continous contribtutions to OpenStreetMap. Regarding you change on way/923589306. You used the value booking=recommended, but this is not widely in usage. Indeed, this is the only use.
I guess you could replace this with reservation=recommended? This tag would be much better documented.
Can you have a look again on this one?
Thanks,
redd

cool, danke

Halo Mikka2021,
Bitte immer aussagekräftige Kommentare und auch Quellenangaben verwenden, damit deine Änderungen verstanden werden können. Sonst droht Sperre. Ich gehe hier von einem Versehen aus, der nun korrigiert werden muss. Dies machst du am besten selber, um den von dir angerichteten Schaden hier und bei anderen Änderungen wieder rückgängig zu machen.
Danke,
Reds

Merci

danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung. Habe die Notiz und die Erfassung als Aussichtspunkt mal entfernt.

Hi Giftzwerg,
was soll dieser Änderungskommentar bedeuten?
Grüße,
redd

Hallo jenskroener,
vielen Dank für deine fleißigen Beiträge zu OpenStreetMap. Es wäre gut, wenn du noch bessere Änderungskommentare hinterlegst und am besten immer mit Quellenangabe arbeitest. Mit "kleine Anpassungen" wird es schwierig zu prüfen, was der tatsächliche Hintergrund der Änderung war.
Hast du die note "Nutzung als Wasserturm beendet. Turm ist zugänglich während der Öffnungszeiten der Gartenwirtschaft." nur grammatikalisch korrigiert oder auch inhaltlich geprüft?

Laut Stuttgarter Zeitung ist der Zugang seit 2018 gesperrt, siehe https://www.stuttgarter-zeitung.de/inhalt.neueroeffnung-in-boeblingen-biergarten-mit-nahezu-perfekter-aussicht.d90d23f5-0749-4397-883d-fe0cbcee30d8.html

Vielen Dank,

Danke

Hi Safrano,
thanks for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. Can you please have a look again on your change on building way/888089683.
You may have also a look on the lifecycle prefix abandoned:*=*.
Thanks,
redd

Hi SK53,
thanks for that feedback. I did clean up some typos by myself in the past, but it was kind of desperating work. Also feels like very lonely work without any human interaction. Therefore I prefer now to get in touch with the other poeple worrking on OpenStreetMap when I find any errors or strange things and use the comment function on the changesets. Most of them were very thanksfully to the found errors.
Greetings,
redd

Thank you!

Thank you!

Danke, ich habe bei einer neuen Relation dieser Art nun auch gebeten, diese wieder zu entfernen:
changeset/118276968

*for your contributions to OpenStreetMap

Hi Acionnae,
thanks for your contributions to English.
I hope that it's ok, that I react in english language, because some value looks strange and should be checked again.
There is building=schoolbuilding=school in way/133525560.
This should probably be only building=school.
Please have a look again on this!
Thanks,
redd

Hi cornx,
thanks for your contributions to OpenStreetMap.
I guess there is a typo in building=monestery and it should be monastery like the amenity?
Can you please check this again?
Thanks,
redd

Hi SK53,
thanks for you very active contributions to OpenStreetMap. It seems like you did an typo on building=semidetached_houseqaa on way/807477682.
Can you have a look again on that one?
Thanks,
redd

Hi UdayGowda,
maybe you are still get informed, when I react on this changeset.
The building tag should be used to describe what kind of building it is. In this example most likely "office", or more general "commercial".
The software company itself could be described as office=software.
Could you please review your changes and try to improve it?
Thanks,
redd