Hi,
If you look in detail you will see that I only deleted overlapping duplicated ways. At least one of your new ways is still there.

Sorry, I don't understand your language. My changes corrected overlapping ways.

Sorry, I don't understand Swedish and Google translate does not provide an reasonable translation. Anyhow it looks as if you corrected the problem you found. Thank you.

See osm.wiki/OSM_Inspector/Views/Routing for a description what OSMI is.
The problem was unconnected nodes.

Adding of the toll=yes tag is one thing, but why did you remove the highway=motorway_link tag?

The same is true for changeset/109101492. I think both changesets should be reverted. I tried it using the JSOM reverter plugin, but there are already a couple of conflicts.

Thank you, fixed it in changeset/108565987.

I was in contact with the DWG last week. I had the impression that they will revert the changes. Unfortunately they didn't promise a date for it. User SomeoneElse said that he is still busy with other big reverts.

I think that all the new paths need to be reverted. I could not find your import on osm.wiki/Import/Catalogue, it looks there was no discussion in advance about it. Where does this data come from, this was not even documented in the changesets.

Please don't manually start editing the data as this would make the task of reverting more difficult.

Es macht keinen Sinn den user zu informieren. Es passiert hin und wieder, dass ways doppelt hochgeladen werden. Der user kann da zu 99% nichts dafür.

Die Wege waren doppelt (übereinanderliegend), deshalb hab ich einen davon jeweils gelöscht.

I have reported the user to the data working group as it is multiple changesets which need to be reverted, It is all the changessets tagged with "new paths". I believe that they have a script via which these can easily be reverted.

This changesset looks like a bad import, see http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=14.78493&lat=48.24178&zoom=8&overlays=snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1#

Besides that the tag Shape_Leng looks pretty strange. Please correct, or otherwise I would like to revert it.

I merged a not connected node of two ways and two separate ways which had the same tags.

You have created multiple overlapping additional superflous ways just to include a name for the highway. Please stop doeing this. Instead utilise the existing ways and create the new name tag for them. Please try to correct the errors you have produced.
Thank you!

Kannst Du bitte den neuen Parkplatzweg way/947825356 überprüfen? Dieser sieht komisch aus, weil er nicht mit dem existierenden Straßennetz verbunden ist und durch Häuser durchgeht.
Danke!

Hi,

you have created a strange way crossing houses. Are you sure that your change is correct, this looks very strange. Thank you.

Hi,
here and on changeset/104390281 you seem to just have updated the GPX data of a cycle route without integrating it into the rest of the existing OSM data. This is not a good idea as it leads to to an unconnect highway. The correct method would be to create a cycleway relation where you integrate all existing segments. As you already have some OSM experience I assume that you know how to do that. If you believe that you don't manage it I will try to do it without knowing the on the ground details.

I'm sorry to bother you again. There are still both ways in the database. One of it should be deleted, because I cannot believe that two ways (one track, one residential are that close and run in parallel. According to way/288064698 it looks as this way has two names, so the way should become part of two street relations. Baye you can answer followiing questions, then I can fix it. What is the surface of it ? Is it "earth" ? Is the highway type track or residential? Thank you.

Your new way way/856043370 runs parallel, but is not connected correctly with the existing way way/288064698. As you are the last author of both ways I'm asking you to delete one of it. Thank you.