Hello and welcome to OSM,

I spotted your edits as they are of low quality. These tertiary roads you are creating do not seem right. According to your change-set comment you are using Bing images as source. But I do not spot any ways on the locations where you created these new tertiary highways. Please describe the motivation of these edits and correct the data you entered.

thanks

ratrun

Hello,
I care about routing connectivity and found your detailed edits are containing a lot of connectivity issues. Here is one typical example of a way you created: way/1341763693#map=19/33.177024/131.539318
As you are not connecting your new ways to the residential highway nearby, automatic connectivity checkers such as OSM Routing view osm.wiki/OSM_Inspector/Views/Routing detect a lot of errors in your edits.
Please connect the ways to the existing road network.
Another more minor issue is the amount of nodes you are creating the end of the ways. These multiple nodes are superfluous.

Thanks,
ratrun

Hallo!

Was ist der Sinn und Zweck der doppelten Erfassung von way/1337248961 , wo way/220093221#map=19/51.419057/7.274610 und way/261193598 bereits parallel dazu laufen? Ich denke den neuen Weg kann man löschen. Oder?

Hi and welcome to OSM!

Please note that in general copying from Google Maps, or tracing Google aerial imagery is unacceptable because of licensing issues. I therefore reverted this changeset.

Thank you. I now only partially reverted your changes in this changeset: changeset/158308645 Could you please check?

Hi and welcome to OSM,

here you changed a stream into a highway=primary : way/476569787/history

and here as well: way/476569790

These changes do not make sense because there are already existing roads and the new ones are not even connected. These changes also do not match your changeset title "Made some pedestrian roads into bus roads". Can you please describe what you intend with your changes?
Maye I can help out with how you can properly apply your change then.

I believe the best might be to completely revert this change and start again from scratch. I may apply this revert for you based on your response.

Thank you
ratrun

Hi, these changes do not make any sense: You created Via di Marciola twice way/1327467085#map=18/43.720738/11.127674 tagged with oneway=no and additionally you created the partially overlapping way way/1327287033 which is tagged with oneway=yes.

My first question is if the oneway=yes is correct, it does not seem to be the case.

If you are not confident with fixing these errors yourself please describe the situation there and what your intention of your changes were.

Thanks ratrun

Hallo!

Zu: "Könntest du evtl. ermitteln, ob dieser Edit hier von den beiden Reverts dann betroffen sein könnte?"

Da ich Verbindungsprobleme ausgebessert habe, die durch diese Changesets entstanden sind, wirst du ziemlich sicher Konflikte bekommen falls du versuchst die genannten Änderungen zu revertieren. Du wirst also zusätzlich zuerste meine Änderungen revertieren müssen.

Thank you, fixed with way/1136330536

It is not only this, the changesets of this user extensively duplicates existing features! I would ask to block this user and revert the 4 changesets which he made the same day. I tried to revert these via the JOSM reverter plugin, but I get a couple of conflicts, so a more professional revert tooling if needed here.

Hi and welcome to OSM,
please explain the source of this modifications. This all sees very unlikely.

Hi,
you edited way/1137278754 .Can you please check it, this none oneway primary, which is not connected at node/11534726699 does not make sense
thanks!

Thank you!
I tried to figure out how this could have happened, but I don't have any idea. And this happened too long ago, such that I do not remember.
May I ask what tool you are using such that you spotted this mistake?

Hi,

I'm analyzing unrealistic long ferry duration's. For way/1136330536 you entered 15 hours. Did you mean 15 minutes, which is still even long for these 1150 meters? Please note that the duration tag does not include any waiting time.
Thanks

Just noticed: The same error is here: way/1102373766

thanks!

Hi,

I'm analyzing unrealistic long ferry duration's. For way/1101437576#map=15/20.96992/105.91142 you entered 30 hours. Did you mean 30 minutes, which is still even long for these 450 meters or 30 seconds?

Sure, the tool I'm using is the Openstreetmap Inspector routing view, see osm.wiki/OSM_Inspector . Here is the setting and zoom level I'm using: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=7.76770&lat=46.90825&zoom=8&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=snap_points%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1%2Cunconnected_open_ends_2%2Cunconnected_open_ends_3%2Cunconnected_open_ends_4%2Cunconnected_open_ends_5%2Cunconnected_open_ends_6

Hi,

please check your edit here. Now there are two parallel ways way/1315867708#map=19/46.317899/6.975411 and way/1315867708 where one of it is superfluous. The same happened with way way/37283347 and way/1315867709

thanks!

Hi and welcome to OSM!

You added new ways without considering the already existing data. As one example see the existing way changeset/73364735#map=19/-7.966239/129.647456 . As you choose to completely add new better aligned ways you need to remove the old data from before.
Can you please take one look again and remove the data where necessary?

Thanks ratrun

Hi, please stop your low quality edits! You have created a bunch of unconnected roads without looking at the already existing data. Whatever your HOT project is which you are working for, but this does not improve the map, it is rather the opposite!
thanks
ratrun