I'm seeing multiple changesets from different users according the same pattern, just duplicating data, not responding to comments. I just informed the DWG and asked for a block.

Could you please explain what you are doing here? To me it looks like you are just duplicating existing data. Please stop this import!

Please stop these useless edits/import, your are just duplicating existing data!
I therefore reverted this changeset.

This changeset produced a lot of duplicates, therefore I reverted it! Please stop this import!

Hi,

Please turn this way
way/1199657559 into a route relation as it looks as this route using ordinary way segments. A highway=busway is only correct if this way is exclusively reserved for buses.
See osm.wiki/Relation:routes

Hi and welcome to OSM!

Please note that adding overlapping ways with the tag highway=busway is not the correct method for adding of a bus route. The correct method is using the existing way segments and putting those into the route relation.
I deleted the superfluous highway=busway segments and instead added the existing ways to the route, please re-check them.

As there is no response so far and you are still editing without obvious improvement I created a discussion on the OSM community forum, see here https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/added-footways-in-offida-from-a-new-user/101213
It would be great if you could participate in the discussion here or there.
If there is no response I plan to remove most of the overlapping footways and all your added tourist attraction POIs.

Hi!
Please put your MTB routes into relations ( see osm.wiki/Relation:route#Cycle_routes_(also_mountain_bike) ) and don't put the oneway=yes on the individual segments. The advantage of using relations is that you can reference existing way segments without the need to create overlapping/parallel ways. And I'm sure your way segments are no oneways. When using a route relation the correct way to map a preferred direction is using the forwards/backward tag on the route - see route=bicycle

Hi!
Welcome to OSM!
As your first edit this changeset is quite complicated and covers a very big area. Please create smaller changesets in the future. Additionally you drew overlapping, disconnected footways, without taking into regards much what was already mapped before.

I would ask you for the future to:
1) Create smaller changesets in smaller areas
2) Follow the warning/error hints your editor shows you
3) Integrate the existing OSM data into your edits
4) Connect new ways to existing ways
5) Connect new ways
6) Don't create overlapping ways
7) Don't create new parallel/overlapping footways in case there is no physical separation to the main road.

On the one hand the changes contain valuable information for walkability such as names and inclines. On the other hand the errors listed above are quite severe and it is difficult to improve for me from the distance as a remote mapper. Please provide feedback here if you understand the issues addressed above and if you are willing to improve this edit.

Hello! I'm not from China and have just connected two ways according to Bing as shown in JOSM. Sorry, but I'm not familiar how to find out the date of a JOSM satellite image.

The new motorway you created is not visible on the imagery you used. Please provide the source of the changes. I doubt that this change is correct.

Please note that I'm usually not changing way tags as long as they aren't obvious errors. I'm just work on way-connectivity. So to me it looks as if you haven't analyzed my changes deeply enough and intend your comments to the original author, but maybe I'm wrong. If you could point me exactly on which way you mean I might be able to give a more detailed response.

Hi!
You haven't connected this new path to the existing network and on your Esri World Imagery source which you used I cannot spot this path. It looks more like fictional mapping to me. Can you please either improve this mapping or revert it if this path does not exist?
Thanks!

The way/1059978660 was not connected to the way/1178221564. I connect both ways via their shared node and merged them into a single way as the tags were identical. So no information was lost.

Please take a look on osm.wiki/OSM_Inspector/Views/Routing to get information about the Openstreetmap Inspector Routing view.
The connectivity quality in the US is not the best as can be seen on e.g. https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-76.65727&lat=40.26253&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=snap_points%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1
In the particular case I created the missing junction node between Tyrion Drive and Sunspear Drive.

As you continued without any response here the deepl french translation:

Comme vous avez continué sans réponse voici la traduction en français :

Vos modifications sont de très mauvaise qualité. D'une part, vous ne vous souciez pas du tout de la connectivité, voir https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=3.04342&lat=36.53927&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=snap_points%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1 et d'autre part, ajouter "highway=road" là où un algorithme d'IA a détecté quelque chose n'est pas une bonne idée. C'est pourquoi je vous demande de cesser cette activité ou de procéder à un contrôle manuel de la qualité _avant_ de télécharger des données ! Si vous ne vous améliorez pas, je rapporterai ce cas au groupe de travail sur les données OSM !

Your edits are of very low quality. First you do not care about connectivity at all, see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=3.04342&lat=36.53927&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=snap_points%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1 and on the other hand adding "highway=road" where some AI algorithm detected someting is not a good idea. Therefore I'm asking you to stop this activity or do manual quality check _before_ uploading any data! If you don't improve I'll report this case to the OSM data working group!

Sorry, I do not understand Chinese. Google translate gave me a translation result, but I do not understand which brige you mean by "Baiqiu Bridge"

Please check all the errors/warnings JOSM gives you before uploading a new changeset. I'm sure you received a bunch of these!

Please check the detailed version information for that way way/583622305/history. I only fixed some of the errors which were there previously. If you want to address the original author who is to blame for bad editing you need to contact user neutan in this case.