You've removed this road with no source tagged and apparently LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery used which definitely shows tracks across the dry river bed. LINZ topo maps also show a track here. Additionally there was a ford tagged which you left.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169316581

Source was "survey;Mapillary"

Correction: source was LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery

"dirt path" appears to be an (un-needed) description not a name, osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166885132

Were you trying to map a building here? Tagging as name=building is not the correct way to do this, please see building=*
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166884884

Is the reference that you added for the bridge or the road? If for the bridge it should be tagged bridge:ref (see bridge=*#Bridge_numbers). See also note/4703942

Manukau Harbour has been correctly tagged as relation/8534169 for 7 years. This looks more like tagging for the renderer. Also is "Second-hand Books" the actual name (looks to be a description) or is it "The Open Book" as per https://theopenbook.co.nz/ ?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166555473

Hi the changeset mapped cycle-way lanes as separate ways, this should only be done where there is a physical barrier between the lanes

Instead of tagging areas of the school as 'landuse=grass' recommended practice is to use 'landuse=recreation ground' and 'surface=grass' as per amenity=school#Single_school_on_one_site.

Also instead of drawing multiple adjacent areas of the same type it is good practice to create a multipolygon and and cut out any different areas by making them `role=inner`

This changeset added a cycle path (way/1381663352) but this is an un-separated cycle lane on the road, which by convention is not drawn as a separate way. Instead such lanes are simply tagged on the road which was already done

Your changeset has show the section linking the Waterview Shared path and Laurel Street as reopened and yet only has the LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery as a source. This was updated because this section was fenced off and closed (as per Mar-2025 Mapillary imagery). Can you confirm it has really been reopened again?

Reverted for fantasy mapping

changeset/164656616

From the aerial imagery this appears to be a residential house and I can find no such branch at https://mcdonalds.co.nz/find-us/restaurants. Can you confirm this really exists?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164611707

Please use descriptive changeset comments as per osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Also the name field should be for proper names only: osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163511908

Thanks, reverted

Some accidental arifact from editing, I've removed it

This duplicates the node you created in changeset #163152569
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163152838

Why have you tagged this section of road as a ford? It does not match the changeset description or the aerial imagery
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163180795

Please use meaningful changeset comments: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162874415

What do you mean by "The triangle is not valid" that you keep using in your changset descriptions?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162635294