OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
158360616 about 1 year ago

Also Puhinui details from visit. Sources also survey and Mapillary (still uploading)

158319653 about 1 year ago

Changeset description was wrong, actually updated completed apartments

157899766 about 1 year ago

Please use meaningful comments in your changesets: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157899766

155976483 over 1 year ago

Review as requested: Adding the building for the store looks good but the store is now mapped as both a node and a polygon (the building). The node shpould instead be replaced by the building so that the principle of "one feature, one OSM element" is followed: osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155976483

154252618 over 1 year ago

You have changed the name of Clarence Street West to Calrence Street yet as seen in this June 2024 imagery (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-36.8288956&lng=174.7928306&z=17&pKey=1655430748603131&focus=photo&x=0.6564028295139888&y=0.3780451361608255&zoom=1.1264080100125153). The signposted name includes "West", can you please advise what your source for this change was?

148791850 over 1 year ago

This change also dragged the address node for 25 Hugh Green Drive. (node/5513377408). Fixed.

134750030 over 2 years ago

You have changed way/102297848 from a building to a park which appears from aerial imagery to be wrong, was this deliberate?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134750030

134515853 over 2 years ago

Thanks for adding the driveway but once again you have added a made up name. As per osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only the name tag is for genuine names only.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134515853

57280475 almost 3 years ago

Not intentional, fixed

128750531 about 3 years ago

As per comments on changeset/128320877 to which you did not reply again you have performed a mass deletion of precisely mapped residential areas.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128750531

128018642 about 3 years ago

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits, looks good except please don't use the name field for generic names like "house" it is reserved for proer names only osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_use_name_tag_to_describe_things. In this case replacing building=yes with building=house would be appropriate building=house
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128018642

86095890 about 3 years ago

Abovencomment wrongly made to V3 instead of V4
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86095890

127023930 about 3 years ago

Do you have a source for your change? The meta data show only "LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery" which does not show a name or lack therof where as the mapillary imagery referred in version 3 shows the name as "Snows Lane"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127023930

86095890 about 3 years ago

Do you have a source for your change? The meta data show only "LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery" which does not show a name or lack therof where as the mapillary imagery referred in version 3 shows the name as "Snows Lane"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86095890

125385141 over 3 years ago

Please do not use the name tag to mark life cycle stages - it is for proper names only. Please see osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix instead
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125385141

124880453 over 3 years ago

Instead of adding POI's you edited existing suburb entries and changed them from suburbs to places of worship, this is not the correct way to edit
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124880453

124663902 over 3 years ago

Your edit has resulted in overlapping buildings. Is the building itself really named "Fonterra Co-Operative Group Ltd" or is this merely one of the businesses contained within?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124663902

124702925 over 3 years ago

Your description mentions yellow pages but you seem to have added no applicable tags, I would expect a name= and something like office= based on the description
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124702925

124332042 over 3 years ago

Thanks for the edits. One thing, please use ITU format for phone numbers: phone=*#Usage I've corrected this one.

124322224 over 3 years ago

Please don't edit the name to include the branch details, instead the branch should be put in a separate branch tag: branch=*
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124322224