Please do not use the name field to tag descriptions like "informal crossing area" - osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105903084

Please see amenity=retirement_home and osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#Stages_of_birth on how to properly tag retirement villages and planned developments
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105802127

Please dont put made up names like "a path through" in the name field : osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105603953

Please use meaningful comments on changesets

Correction - Henderson, not Te Atatu South

You've tagged this as a turning_circle (highway=turning_circle) but described it as a roundabout - they aren't the same. If truely a roundabout it should be tagged as a mini_roundabout (highway=mini_roundabout) or drawn and tagged as a full roundabout (junction=roundabout)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104853350

Please use meaningful changeset comments as per: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.

Also if this is a vaccination centre then the tags used seem wrong, see healthcare=vaccination_centre
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104539155

Please use changeset comments as per: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104414691

Can you please use meaningful changeset comments?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104386065

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. Can you please use desciptive changset comments as per: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map. Also why have you changed the campsite to a park? The (unchanged) name and other tags suggest camp_site was the correct tagging.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104279125

This changeset also moved node/5262962590 for 6/161 to the NorthEast of it's previous location which seems wrong, was it intentional?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104147190

Based on the LINZ aerial imagery only the SW corner of the way appears covered so if mapped this way it should be split and only the actual covered area tagged as such. A more correct tagging is I believe to leave the way with no layer but covered=yes and tag just the overhanging portion of the buildings with building=roof and layer=1. Alternatively don't draw a seperate way for footpaths and just add sidewalk=left|right|both on the road - much easier to maintain topology this way as well

way/933228563#map=17/-43.47601/172.61973
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103322520

way/933228563 has been tagged with layer=-1 but is not tagged as a tunnel, is it really unde rthe other features?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103322520

Is the swimming pool missing a location=indoor tag? See leisure=swimming_pool
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103301625

Imports must use a dedicated user account as per osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines#Use_a_dedicated_user_account
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102910208

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. A few questions and issues: 1) Please use desciptive changset comments as per: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments 2) You have dragged node/623667975 of residential area way/49164877 into the road way/7633293 3) way/930486806 with just a name and note field is not a valid OSM object and makes no sense as it crosses multiple roads
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102896166

Fixed

This path does not exist, the LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery for here is outdated. Removing

Fixed
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101594923