I've cleaned this up

I've cleaned this up

What is the source for these changes, none of the names seem reasonable
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82418904

Do you have a source for these changes because none of the names seem correct. Also please use descriptive changeset comments
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82418972

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits - from the aerial imagery I believe what you have tagged here is a driveway and not a residential road. See service=driveway and highway=residential
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82410666

Please don't use the name fields for descriptions like "Personal House", osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only. Also please use more meaningful changeset comments: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82367063

Appears to be a driveway not a footway. Tagging a footway with motor_vehicle=yes in contradictory
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82367200

From the aerial imagery this appears to be a driveway not a path
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82367240

Additionally Countdown was already tagged as a node, you should edit that to add the additional details rather than add a new entity

Why did you delete the parking iasle? Also you added a dangling footway also tagged as a crossing which is not required - there was already a crossing node.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82367471

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Instead of amenity=marketplace (amenity=marketplace) Countdown should be tagged as shop=supermarket (shop=supermarket)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82367630

There is already a park here "Windy Ridge Reserve" which is the correct name according to the Auckland Council park extents data set - reverting your change
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82327753

Please don't use the name for descriptions
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82326855

This just appears to be vandalism, i.e. a house tagged as a highway rest area
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82327211

Please don't use the name field for descriptions like "Soccer field"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82327398

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. There are a few problems: 1) IT should not be tagged as a ford; 2) It appears to be a driveway not a footway; 3) If it was a footway it should not be tagged motor_vehicle=yes; 4) An address should not be used as a highway name; 5) I doubt horse=yes is correct
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82327512

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. You have added parking=carports to the whole parking area but that is for covered parking (parking=*). From the aerial imagery it appears as if the majority of the car park is uncovered. I think you should just add an entity tagged building=carport for the specific carport area.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82317480

This changeset also dragged a node from the Massey Uni car park onto Albany Expressway - fixed.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82246726

This changeset has overlayed a highway (tagged crossing) on top of the existing highway (tagged footway) which is an error. Instead I've tagged the nodes where the existing footway crosses the Albany Express way as a crossing and use "crossing=traffic_signals". Please look out for warnings and erros in the ID editor because it warned of this problem
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82291217

These changes are not supported by aerial imagery and based on the names used and description appear to be vandalism and are being reverted. Please note that OSM is meant to reflect real world verifiable details only and should not be used for fantasy mapping
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82275238