OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
157584123 6 months ago

It needs to be updated again.
You Apple guys should stop mapping temporary roads.

164909214 7 months ago

Hi, has this railroad line been reopened recently?
Also I am not able to find this bridge on bing
way/1377282026

167349559 7 months ago

Once you have reached a conclusion, you can continue here:
osm.org/#map=17/-10.437723/34.261658

165383983 8 months ago

another pseudo validatet project

way/1374821959

way/1374821956

way/1374818436

+ 260 "highway=unclassified" and 112 "highway=residential"
questionable Version 1 roads roads by this user alone

164223267 9 months ago

a way tagged as building by yourself:
way/1112079052

a way without any tags:
way/1372491083

just open the changeset , click the edit button and add the missing tags

or follow this link to do so

osm.org/edit?editor=id&changeset=164224209#map=17/-17.355752/37.271540

137662552 11 months ago

way/650709159/history

v1: adt/residential
v2 adt/residential
v3-v5 remote/ residential
v6 local/service
v7 local/footway
v8 adt/residential
v9 local/service
v10 local/service

and the local mappers are quite expirienced. So who is causing problems here?

137662552 11 months ago

Even when these roads are connected to others, they remain primarily access roads.

The real challenge with informal settlements is to keep the mapping up to date. And I think that's the case here.

137662552 11 months ago

John,
Classification is about enabling our users to find the best route. To do this, it must be possible to distinguish between important and unimportant roads on the map.
If the better roads are at best "residential" or "unclassified", then it is legitimate to classify other roads that were never built for car traffic lower.
You should try out Openstreetmap.org's routing function in different places. Especially in areas that are mapped according to the HOT standard, there will be some unpleasant surprises.

158982850 about 1 year ago

Bad import?
I would suggest removing all this data

Incorrect tagging
Incorrect placement
Multiple nodes with identical tags close together

This should be fixed before uploading

node/12339846071
node/12324515935
node/12331462012
node/12331461805

158575050 about 1 year ago

Good but still not really rectangular

[Q] – square the corners of the selected area or closed line

158427819 about 1 year ago

crossing buildings,
not squared

158574442 about 1 year ago

The building already exists. Why couldn't you just add the tags?
way/393021389

same here:
way/1327477390

just correct the tagging instead of adding a new odd shape

158572819 about 1 year ago

This time it is a building but not a landuse

158413699 about 1 year ago

way/1328565526

avoid overlapping landuse!

158393961 about 1 year ago

way/367080392

This way is not a farmyard.
Please fix it!

158396719 about 1 year ago

way/1328483265

not a building
not layer=-1

157993939 about 1 year ago

way/1324617500

cemetery?

158029607 about 1 year ago

name=*?uselang=en

osm.wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information

158037383 about 1 year ago

already there

way/274933475

157958678 about 1 year ago

Please have a look here:

@Koreller/diary/404988

and here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHthbdBbJZU

before you continue