2.5m² ?
Use your own brain rather than AI!
This group of buildings is completely wrong.

Doesn't Apple pay for removing wrong data?
Wrong roads are worse than missing roads!
So just do it.

way/256146649#map=19/-17.87345/31.15685

These way have to be removed
Compare bing/maxar. Best practice is to delete twice as much as add.

review:
It is not your fault, but while working in this area you could have removed the name tag
8x name=highway
1x name=water
most of the roads here are far to narrow to be tagged as "unclassified" or "track". "highway=path" would be more suitable. Most of this ways could be removed without affecting the functionality of the map.
This road is not there any more:
way/1032686567#map=19/-13.79297/29.63756
This node was dragged:
node/6395528236
Split roads here:
node/7385009550#map=19/-13.78867/29.63882
Then reconnect and retag them in a meaningful way.
This are only a few examples of what have to be typically done while working on HOT data.

The road you have added here is not connected to the network. I highly doubt that this is even a map-worthy street
If you had zoomed out a bit, you might have found a lot of streets worth adding to the map.

changeset/123100970

way/666502520
not a residential area!
what is apple doing here?

node/5144887275#map=19/-17.88738/31.26491
Please check also the alignment when changing the classification

residential ways are straight and planned!

remove this crap instead of hiding it by changing the classification

wirklich oneway?

https://structurae.net/en/structures/chirundu-bridge

Die Brücke ist schnurgerade. Der Bogen ergibt sich nur durch den Höhenunterschied zum Geländeprofil. Ähnlich wie bei hohen Gebäuden. Du kannst zum Vergleich ja mal den Mapbox Layer aktivieren.

I rebuilded the boundary relations with shared ways. Geometry should not have been affected
changeset/121548479

amenity=place_of_worship instead of shop=religion?

Hello otji73
I have already disconnected it.
I hope you don't mind. It's just to make the data more maintainable

imo the shift is based on local knowledge! There is a general problem with parallel or overlapping boundary ways (administrative and protected area) Looks like rough imported data. All this relations should have been reworked, so that segments are shared by adjacent relations

Hallo,
Die Verbindung von Flächen mit anderen Flächen ist in Ordnung.
Das Verbinden von Flächen mit Straßen oder anderen Linien ist keine gute Praxis.

kommst du da nochmal hin?

Hallo,
war die Lücke beabsichtigt?

razed:highway=*
but what for?

way/218565834/history

onway?